Answer:
<u>Feminist Theory</u> is the criticism of symbolic interactionist theories of gender and sexuality this illustrate
Explanation:
In the sociologist studies carried out on the perspective on genders was able to group the relationship between genders and the likely result to actualise. For example, a male person requesting for loan would rather make an emotional appeal to a female loan officer than to a male loan officer.
<em>In the case of Sofiya and Brandon (couples), their decision is based on the feminst theory of equal duty and action. Unfortunately, the work carried out tends to be little for Sofiya than Brandon thereby negating the interactionist theory on gender and sexuality based on feminisim which it tends to promote.</em>
Answer:
Schachtet- singer emotion theory
Explanation:
The Schachter-Singer Theory which is also commonly known as the Two-Factor theory of emotion, suggests that 2 factors are needed to experience emotion:a physiological respomsecand a cognitive label. The theory was originated by researchers Stanley Schachter and Jerome E. Singer. According to this theory, a person who feels an emotion physiologically would need the environment to cognitively label what he feels-the emotion. In essence depending on the environment to understand his emotions
An example that shows how Romans gave away citizenship rights in measured amounts can be seen when we look at the difference between the <em>Latini</em> and the <em>Foederati</em>.
The <em>Latini</em> were people who were born outside of Rome but on the Italian peninsula. Their citizenship allowed them to do business with Rome, and travel and live within the Empire. However, they were not allowed to have a Roman marriage. The <em>Foederati</em>, on the other hand, were the citizens of states that had obligations towards Rome. They were given limited citizenship rights in exchange for military service.
Option A
These include athletes being more extraverted and conscientious and less neurotic than non athletes
<u>Explanation:</u>
The athletes have a more formidable spirit, more prolonging, greater self-conceit, and a more powerful strength goal than non-athletes. Athletes have added positive oneself features than non-athletes. Athletes vary from nonathletes on multiple personality attributes. One of the several constant conclusions is that athletes are higher extraverted and slightly erratic than non-athletes.
Still, there is a more limited understanding of how personality changes from sport to sport. Athletes who compete in crew and specific sports are more confident, stronger unbiased, and few afraid than nonathletes
I am not sure but I think it is the Durham-Humphrey Act
