Answer:
D. There is not enough evidence at the 5% significance level to indicate that one route gets Katy to work faster, on average, since 0 falls within the bounds of the confidence interval.
Step-by-step explanation:
At 5% confidence level, Katy found difference in mean commuting times (Route 1-Route 2) in minutes as (-1,9).
Since no difference in means (0 min) falls within the confidence level (-1,9), we can not reject the hypothesis that there is no difference in mean commuting times when using Route1 or Route2.
A <em>higher</em> significance level(10% etc) may lead a <em>shorter</em> confidence interval leaving 0 outside and may reach a conclusion that Route1 takes longer than Route2
Answer:
b. left- skewed
Step-by-step explanation:
edge 2020
Answer:
a) see your problem statement for the explanation
b) 2.54539334183
Step-by-step explanation:
(b) Many graphing calculators have a derivative function that lets you define the Newton's Method iterator as a function. That iterator is ...
x' = x - f(x)/f'(x)
where x' is the next "guess" and f'(x) is the derivative of f(x). In the attached, we use g(x) instead of x' for the iterated value.
Here, our f(x) is ...
f(x) = 3x^4 -8x^3 +6
An expression for f'(x) is
f'(x) = 12x^3 -24x^2
but we don't need to know that when we use the calculator's derivative function.
When we start with x=2.545 from the point displayed on the graph, the iteration function g(x) in the attached immediately shows the next decimal digits to be 393. Thus, after 1 iteration starting with 4 significant digits, we have a result good to the desired 6 significant digits: 2.545393. (The interactive nature of this calculator means we can copy additional digits from the iterated value to g(x) until the iterated value changes no more. We have shown that the iterator output is equal to the iterator input, but we get the same output for only 7 significant digits of input.)
___
<em>Alternate iterator function</em>
If we were calculating the iterated value by hand, we might want to write the iterator as a rational function in Horner form.
g(x) = x - (3x^4 -8x^3 +6)/(12x^3 -24x^2) = (9x^4 -16x^3 -6)/(12x^3 -24x^2)
g(x) = ((9x -16)x^3 -6)/((12x -24)x^2) . . . . iterator suitable for hand calculation
Answer:
4) 7.9%
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
% of milk chocolate = 70%
% of white chocolate = 30%
Total number of chocolate = 20
Number of milk chocolate:

Number of white chocolate:
From the calculations, we now know there are 14 milk chocolates and 6 white chocolates.
2 white chocolates are picked at random without replacement.
Probability first chocolate picked was white: 
Probability second chocolate picked was white: 
To find probability that both of them are white chocolates, multiply probability of the first and second.
0.3 * 0.2632 = 0.07896
≈ 0.079
Convert to percentage by multiplying by 100.
0.079 * 100 = 7.9%
The probability that they are both
white chocolate is 7.9%