Answer:
A-1 B-3 C-4 D-2
Explanation:
The description given in option A fits utilitarianism which is an ethical term describing a decision where the best outcome for the largest possible number of people is considered the solution.
The description given in option B fits social contract which desribes accepting the authority of the state and deciding on basic principles so that the society can exist.
The description given in option C fits virtue ethics which is a field of ethics that discusses virtues such as honesty.
The description given in option D fits deontology which is an ethical theory that suggests that each action should be examined if it is good or bad by following certain rules.
I hope this answer helps.
Answer:
Explanation:
Present value of annuity due = (1+interest rate)*Annuity[1-(1+interest rate)^ -time period]/rate
=(1+0.075)*25000*[1-(1.075)^-15]/0.075
=$25000*9.489153726
=$237,228.84
Answer:
I took some work home because I had to meet an important deadline the next morning. If I am able to finish the work on time and do it correctly, then there is a chance of getting either a promotion or a pay raise. If I cannot complete it on time, I will not get fired, but any chances of a promotion or pay raise in the near will vanish.
Since I was working at home, I couldn't prepare anything for dinner, so I decided to buy food on a website and get it delivered home. I spent $20 on my dinner, even though I could have prepared a similar dinner for $5.
I was willing to pay for the expensive meal because the opportunity cost of preparing dinner instead was too high. I can afford to pay $15 more for eating, but I cannot afford to lose the opportunity of a promotion or a pay raise. Even if I do not get them immediately, not completing my job would have made it much harder to get it in the future.
My decision is rational because I was sacrificing a small amount of money in order to preserve something that is really valuable for me (promotion or pay raise).
All resources are scarce, and in this case, time was scarce. So I had to decide which action was more valuable and which action could yield a higher benefit.
Answer:
Explanation:
Great question, intermediaries are sometimes necessary since they provide a service in which you might not be able to get the product if their service wasn't provided. That being said we can say that Caesar's claim is not valid in many cases. Intermediaries tend to add an additional cost to a certain product, but like mentioned above they are providing an essential value. In many cases the value they create more than offsets the costs they add. Therefore the validity of Caesar's claim is dependent on the intermediaries provided value.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
$48.50
Explanation:
Relevant costs are the costs that are influenced by managerial decisions.They are future costs that have the tendency to affect the cash flow or outflow above the current level , that are relevant in making decisions . Examples are opportunity cost , incremental cost
The relevant cost in the scenario is the cost of buying from the supplier instead of in-house manufacturing , which is $48.50
