The answer is d plz correct me if I'm wrong
The correct answers are A) International treaties can limit the influence of the United States. B) NAFTA has resulted in a loss of jobs for many American workers. D)The United Nations is often ineffective at solving global problems. F) Rules set by the World Trade Organization benefit only big corporations.
Some objections critics have raised in response to global agreements and organizations are the following: International treaties can limit the influence of the United States, NAFTA has resulted in a loss of jobs for many American workers, the United Nations is often ineffective at solving global problems, and rules set by the World Trade Organization benefit only big corporations.
In a globalized world, countries have to sign treaties and agreements to cooperate. In the United States, many critiques do not agree with these agreements and treaties signed by the US because they think they affect the US economy and sovereignty. However, the US cannot act alone like in the past. Powerful European countries have increased their power such as Germany, and have formed trade blocks such as the European Union that represented a threat to the commercial interests of the United States. That is why it signed NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, now modified and with a new name: USMCA, the United States, México, and Canada Agreement.
<em>The Vietnam War</em> was known in Vietnam as "<em>The Resistance War Against America"</em> from around 1955 and 1975; it was initially (<em>the 2nd Indochina War</em>) between North Vietnam and South Vietnam; North Vietnam supported by U.R.S.S. and South Vietnam supported by U.S.A. which got involved around 1960, the conflict was intensified by the "<em>Cold War</em>" at that time.
The "<em>Viet Cong</em>" used guerrilla warfare and <em>American soldiers had trouble finding attackers in the dense jungles</em>; around 58,000 Americans were killed in that war; U.S.A. took away forces in 1973 and North Vietnam took control of South Vietnam.
Answer:
D misinformation effect paradigm
Explanation:
The misinformation effect: In psychology, the misinformation effect is defined as the inaccurate recall of past-event information by an individual. The new information that has been formed in an individual's memory works backwards in time to diminish or distort the memory related to the original event. It came into existence or being studied since the 1970s. It often leads to the development of false memories and inaccurate memories.
In the question above, the given statement is an example of the misinformation effect paradigm.
Answer: wishes
Explanation:
Each is a singular, it would be inappropriate to us wished, it would be wishes because it's singular
