Answer:
Explanation:
M. Pollan (2006) describes in his book “The omnivore's dilemma: A natural history of four meals” that human kind has fighted to get food as a basic need since ancient times. Nowadays, modernity and the intervention of science have made possible to have almost all kinds of foods available at the supermarket, while in the past, in order to have food, humans needed to depend on their skills to grow or hunt their meals, because as omnivores as we are, we eat basically everything (vegetable or animal) and need it in order to survive. Though, we like to think that we now have a great diversity available, Pollan (2006) describes in his book that this is only an illusion, created by capitalism, because basically must of our food is only corn in different presentations, at the end, only corn…he refers “ there are some forty-five thousand items in the average American supermarket and more than a quarter of them contain corn” (p.11)
References: Pollan, M. (2006). The omnivore's dilemma: A natural history of four meals. Penguin.
<span>Nowadays, Education faces many new challenges in connection to cial. economic or cultural circumstances that is why each student will have a different encounter with his/her education. It might depend on social class, religion and background. It is responsibility of each student to set his/ her goals straight in order to achieve what he/she wants from education. </span>
Answer:
the more powerful person.
Explanation:
A person who interrupts during a conversation is perceived to be <u>the more powerful person</u>. In a conversation it is regarded to be wrong for a less powerful individual to interrupt the conversation. for example, when an employee is discussing with his/her employer, there is the tendency for the employer to interrupt to make or seek corrections because he is the more powerful person in that situation and the action will not be regarded as disrespectful. On the other hand, when an employee interrupts his employer, that action may be regarded as rude. Generally, an individual who interrupts a conversation is the stronger one.
Answer:
Self-perception theory
Explanation:
Self-perception theory explains the process in which an individual, lacking in initial attitudes or emotional responses, builds them up by examining their own behavior and coming to conclusions as to what attitude must have triggered that behavior.
This type of theory is counterintuitive. General knowledge would have us suppose that a person’s personality and behavioral pattern drives their actions; however, self-perception theory shows that this is not at all times the case. In simple terms, the theory illustrates that “we are what we do.” And as individuals we interpret our own deeds the manner to which we interpret others’ actions, and our actions are most of the time socially influenced and not triggered out of our own free will.
