Answer:
The following text belongs to the first part of the question:
At the large multi-specialty clinic in which you work, there have been two near misses and one medical error because various clinicians did not follow up on patient results. Different caregivers were involved each time. When asked why they failed to follow up, each caregiver said he or she forgot.
The correct answer is:
a) Human error
Explanation:
In this case the general behavior from the caregivers could be classified as a human error, since it is a conduct that was not intentionally developed. As it possible to see in this specific case, human errors can be perceived in any environment in which the human intervention is carried out, because it is considered a really common behavior that can be prevented taking into account the high risk that it might involve depending on the ambit and responsibilities of the participants of the process.
The best evaluation would be that the statement is invalid because we cannot be sure if the argument is referring to the same <span>provost. The whole paragraph is a fallacy. It was not directly stated that James Hoopster was the provost who saved the university from crisis. It just so happened that James Hoopster took the same path as to the provost who saved the university.</span>
Answer:
groupthink
Explanation:
Asterisk Inc. decided to change some of its policies. Jensen, a team manager, conducted a meeting to inform his team about the management's decision. During the meeting, the majority of Jensen's team members were in favor of the policies except Sandy. As a result, Sandy decided not to voice her concerns about the policy changes fearing negative consequences. This scenario illustrates the concept of <u>groupthink</u>.
Groupthink is based on the desire not to upset the balance/harmony of a group of people thinking about a situation, it is a phenomenon whereby a group of individuals reach a premature consensus on an issue without critical reasoning or evaluation of the consequences or alternatives in a bid to avoid dissenting views and opinion. It is a situation whereby harmony in a group is promoted more than critical and objective analysis of issues.
Answer:
Strong position power high task structure, good leader-member relations.
Explanation:
The contingency model was proposed by Fiedler in 1960. This model describes the personality and leadership qualities of a person. The effective way of leadership based on the situation rather than there is one of the best leadership styles. There is no one is the best leadership style. Best leadership style based on two factor
- Situational favorableness
It has been believed that leadership is a static style that can be measured by a scale that was proposed by Fiedler Least-Preferred Co-worker Scale.
