So hmmm let's see
she has a monthly income of 120 from investments, now, there are 12 months in a year, so her yearly income from investments are 120*12 or
$1440
she plays on a band, and makes 200 a week, now, there are 52 weeks in a year, so her yearly income from band playing is 200 * 52, or
$10400
her total annual income is 49696, now, if we subtract the band and investment income, we'd be left over with only what comes from her job payrate
so 49696 - 1440 - 10400 is 37856
so, she makes from her job, $37856 annually
now, she only works 28 hours weekly, how much is that yearly? well, 52 weeks in a year, she works 28*52 hours a year, let us divide 37856 by that
37856 ÷ ( 28 * 52) well, it ends up as 26
so, her hourly payrate is $26 per hour
now, she wants to ask for a raise, to make 51880 annually
well, if we check the difference of 51880 and 49696, that'd leave us with the difference in pay, or the raise annual amount
51880 - 49696 = 2184
ok, so she wants $2184 annually more from her work
how much is that in the hours she works annually? well 2184 ÷ ( 28 * 52)
Answer:
can you post a question that actually has the right graphics
Step-by-step explanation:
The volume of the removed portion is 35 cm³.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given,
The length× width× height (L×B×H) of the outer part = 3 cm×3 cm×7 cm
The length× width× height (l×b×h) of the inner part = 2 cm×2 cm×7 cm
To find the volume of the removed portion.
Formula
The volume of the removed portion = volume of outer part - volume of inner part
Volume of rectangular prism = l×b×h
Now,
Volume of outer part = 3×3×7 cm³ = 63 cm³
Volume of inner part = 2×2×7 cm³ = 28 cm³
Hence,
The volume of the removed portion = 63-28 cm³ = 35 cm³
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the information given, we would write the hypothesis.
For the null hypothesis,
H0 : µ = 70
For the null hypothesis,
Ha : µ > 70
This is a right tailed test because of the symbol of greater than.
The decision rule is to reject the null hypothesis if the level of significance is greater than the p value and accept the null hypothesis if the level of significance is lesser than the p value.
Therefore, since the significance level, 0.05 > p value, 0.01635, then we would reject the null hypothesis. There is enough evidence that the mean speed of all cars is greater than the posted speed limit of 70 mph.
Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
The way to find the line of best fit by estimate is to have about half the points be above and below the line of best fit. In this case Tariq followed the first few points of the data but his estimate would be very off after 10 on the x axis. This would not accurately predict what the next data point could be.
