answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
damaskus [11]
2 years ago
12

An outside supplier has offered to produce and sell the part to the company for $23.40 each. If this offer is accepted, the supe

rvisor's salary and all of the variable costs, including direct labor, can be avoided. The special equipment used to make the part was purchased many years ago and has no salvage value or other use. The allocated general overhead represents fixed costs of the entire company, none of which would be avoided if the part were purchased instead of produced internally. In addition to the facts given above, assume that the space used to produce part U98 could be used to make more of one of the company's other products, generating an additional segment margin of $18,800 per year for that product. What would be the financial advantage (disadvantage) of buying part U98 from the outside supplier and using the freed space to make more of the other product?
Business
1 answer:
anastassius [24]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It will be a financing advantage for 18,800 It should accept the offer

<em><u>Missing Information</u></em>

Kleffman Corporation is presently making part X31 that is used in one of its products. A total of 2,000 units of this part are produced and used every year. The company's Accounting Department reports the following costs of producing the part at this level of activity:

DM                 $6.90

DL                  $4.90

V MO          $8.00

Supervisor  $2.20

Depreciation  $1.40

general          $2.80

total cost  $ 26.20

Explanation:

We will face unavoidable cost for:

$2.80 x 2,000 units = $5,600

The depreciation should be considered sunk cost as financially it do not repreent any cash flow for the company.

Make cost: 2,000 units x $26.20 =    $ 52,400

opportunity cost:

additional segment margin               <u>  $ 18,800  </u>

Total cost                                              $ 71,200

Purchase cost: $ 23.40 x 2,000 = $  46,800

unavoidable cost:                        <u>   $    5,600  </u>

Total cost                                         $ 52,400

Differential: 71,200 -52,400 = 18,800

You might be interested in
Canada and the U.S. both produce wheat and computer software. Canada is said to have the comparative advantage in producing whea
timurjin [86]

Answer:

The correct answer is <em>d. Canada requires fewer resources than the U.S. to produce a bushel of wheat.</em>

Explanation:

A country (in this case Canada) has a comparative advantage over another country (in this case the United States) to produce a certain product (in this case wheat) if the production costs of that product (wheat) are less than from the other country, regardless of the opportunity cost of producing that other product in that country.

The comparative advantage is based on the fact that the country has developed greater efficiency in the use of resources or that it has greater ease of access to them due to better conditions of nature, greater technological development in the field in question, human capital more specialized in that economic field, etc.

The opportunity cost of producing a product or another in the same country does not affect a deterioration or increase of the comparative advantage developed to produce such a product.

6 0
2 years ago
A one-time error in the application of the lower of cost or market/net realizable value (LCM/NRV) rule in the current period dis
Kipish [7]

Answer:

A one-time error in the application of the lower of cost or market/net realizable value (LCM/NRV) rule in the current period distorts financial results for the current accounting period:

a. only.

Explanation:

The lower of cost or market (LCM/NRV) method states that when valuing a company's inventory use the historical cost or the market value, whichever is lower.  The historical cost refers to the cost at which the inventory was purchased.  The market value is the current price.  The implication is that while the historical cost remains static, the market value shifts over time.

Therefore, if there is a one-time error made in the use of the LCM/NRV rule, it only affects the current period.  The next accounting period will restart the process of comparing the historical costs with the market value, thus obviating the need to repeat the error.

8 0
2 years ago
Kuhn Bicycle Company has been manufactring its own seats for its bicycles. The company is currently operating at 100% capacity,
AfilCa [17]

Answer:

It is cheaper to buy the seats.

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

The company is currently operating at 100% capacity, and variable manufacturing overhead is charged to production at the rate of 60% of direct labor cost. The direct materials and direct labor cost per unit to make the bicycle seats are $8.00 and $9.00, respectively. Normal production is 50,000 bicycles per year. A supplier offers to make the bicycle seats for $21 each. If the bicycle company accepts this offer, all variable manufacturing costs will be eliminated, but the $30,000 of fixed manufacturing overhead currently being charged to the bicycle seats will have to be absorbed by other products.

Make in house= [8 + 9 + (9*0.6)]*50,000= $1,120,000

Buy= 21*50,000= $1,050,000

It is cheaper to buy the seats.

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following statements correctly compares/contrasts economies of scale and economies of scope?a) economies of scale r
nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

d) economies of scale result from decline in the average cost of production per unit as volume increases whereas economies of scope result from decline in the average cost of production due to the sharing resources across products and services.

4 0
2 years ago
Assume that a six-firm cartel supplies 500 million units of Whatailsya energy drink at a price of $5.00 per unit. Each firm supp
bazaltina [42]

Answer:

<u>The net gain for the firm cheating the cartel is US$ 183 million (rounding the answer to the nearest million).</u>

Explanation:

1. Let's review all the information provided for solving this case:

Number of firms that supply  Whatailsya energy drink = 6

Amount of production of the cartel of six firms = 500 million units

Price of the energy drink = US$ 5

Amount of production of the firm that decided to break the cartel = 50 million extra units

Price after the extra production is sold = US$ 4.50

2. Let's find the individual production of each firm before and after the 50 million extra units and the net gains for the cheating firm.

Individual production of each firm of the cartel = Amount of production of the cartel/Number of firms

Individual production of each firm of the cartel = 500 million units/6

Individual production of each firm of the cartel = 83.33 million units

Individual sales of each firm before the 50 million extra units = Individual production * Price of the energy drink

Individual sales of each firm before the 50 million extra units = 83.333 million * 5

Individual sales revenue of each firm before the 50 million extra units = US$ 416.666 million

New production amount of the firm cheating the cartel = 83.333 + 50

New production amount of the firm cheating the cartel = 133.333 million units

Price of the energy drink after the extra production is sold = US$ 4.50

New sales revenue of the firm cheating the cartel = New production amount * Price of the energy drink after the extra production is sold

New sales revenue of the firm cheating the cartel = 133.333 million * 4.50

New sales revenue of the firm cheating the cartel = US$ 600 million

Net gain of the firm cheating the cartel = New sales revenue of the firm cheating the cartel - Individual sales of each firm before the 50 million extra units

Net gain of the firm cheating the cartel = 600 million - 416.666 million

Net gain of the firm cheating the cartel = 183.333 million

<u>Net gain of the firm cheating the cartel = US$ 183 million (rounding the answer to the nearest million)</u>

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happens if Jeff refuses to pay the equilibrium wage for coffee shop employees?
    6·2 answers
  • Frodic Corporation has budgeted sales and production over the next quarter as follows: July August September Sales in units 40,0
    6·1 answer
  • "North Shore Community College reimburses faculty members $.535 cents per mile to go to a workshop. Professor Wales submitted he
    14·1 answer
  • After preparing its financial statements for November, Unique Interiors notices that its income statement shows total expenses t
    11·2 answers
  • The Hatfields and the McCoys both earn $50,000 per year in real terms in the labor market, and both families are able to earn a
    6·1 answer
  • Phillips NV produces DVD players and exports them to the United States. Last year the exchange rate was​ $1.25/euro and Phillips
    11·1 answer
  • Luann is trying to schedule a meeting in outlook. part of her computer screen is shown. which part of the process is luann most
    6·1 answer
  • Organic Laboratories allocates research and development costs to its three research facilities based on each facility's total an
    12·1 answer
  • Joan Johnson is a paralegal for a large law firm that handles corporate and securities work. The lawyer for whom Joan works alwa
    11·1 answer
  • Miller Nwagi will not ride in elevators because he perceives them to be confining boxes that could fall. He refused to visit a s
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!