Answer:
The statement is true
Explanation:
As a fact, I agree that with large sample sizes, even the small differences between the null value and the observed point estimate can be statistically significant.
To put it differently, any differences between the null value and the observed point estimate will be material and/or significant if the samples are large in shape and form.
It's also established that point estimate get more clearer and understandable, and the difference between the mean and the null value can be easily singled out if the sample size is bigger.
Suffix to say, however, while the difference may connote a statistical importance, the practical implication notwithstanding, will be looked and studied on a different set of rules and procedures, beyond the statistical relevance.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: the product is now relatively more expensive than it was before.
Explanation:
To begin with, the <em>substitution effect</em> is the term that, in economics, refers to the situation where a products or services increase or decrease its value in comparison with other and therefore it causes a substitution from the consumer regarding that change in the price.
Secondly, in the case where a product increases its price the substitution effect will cause that the consumer decides to purchase other products due to the fact that the first product is now relatively more expensive than it was before and therefore a substitution of the good takes place.
Answer:
The first dramatic swing happened in the 1970s when there was a sharp <em><u>rise</u></em> in the real price of oil caused by the <em><u>formation of OPEC.</u></em>
In 1973, the World saw it's first oil spike when members of the Organization of Oil Exporting Countries (OPEC) being mostly Muslims, decided to punish the Western World for their perceived support of the Israelis in the Yom Kippur War. They placed an embargo on the sale of oil to the West and because they controlled 56% of the then World supply, this was enough to force the price of oil up due to the reduction in demand.
<em />
The second swing happened in the 2000s when there was a sharp <em><u>rise</u></em><u> </u>in the real price of oil caused by <em><u>increased demand from emerging economies.</u></em>
From the early 2000s to 2008, the price of oil kept rising steadily till it reached around $147.30 in July 2008. This rise in prices was due to increased demand from newly industrialized and emerging nations like China that needed the oil to maintain their rapid growth.
<u><em /></u>
The most recent swing happened in 2008 when there was a sharp <em><u>drop</u></em><em> </em>in the real price of oil caused by<em> </em><em><u>a large financial crisis.</u></em><em> </em>
By December 2008, the price of oil had fallen to $32 and this was down to the global recession that was ravaging the World known as the Great Recession. As the world saw economic output fall, demand for oil decreased sharply thereby forcing the price of oil to fall dramatically.
Answer: $40
Explanation:
First find the required return using CAPM;
Required return = Riskfree rate + beta * (Market return - riskfree rate)
= 6% + 0.5 * (13% - 6%)
= 9.5%
Then use DDM to determine intrinsic value;
= Next dividend / (Required return - growth rate)
= 5 / (9.5% - (-3%))
= $40
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "E": A price war.
Explanation:
A price war is a situation in which competitors undercut prices to offer their products at a lower level than their rivals so they can attract more consumers. Manufacturers find ways to cut their costs so they can stay profitable under these circumstances. If they are unable to do that, the company will end up with losses.
