Answer:
Informational and Normative
Explanation:
Both Sherif’s autokinetic illusion study (1936) and Asch’s line study (1951) demonstrated the effect of conformity on an individual’s decision making; however, they each captured different aspects of conformity. The results of Sherif’s study reflected INFORMATIONAL social influence whereas Asch’s study reflected NORMATIVE social influence.
Informational influence which States that people conform because they want to be correct in their judgments explains
SHERIFS EXPERIMENT
Normative Influence which believes that People conform because they fear the consequences of being deviant explains ASCH'S EXPERIMENT
Answer:
b. female genital mutilation
Explanation:
Female genital mutilation -
It is the method by which the female genitalia is partially or completely removed , which is carried out without any medical reasons.
These practices are performed during the very young age of children birth , and there is possibility that in future , it might hamper the female body , during childbirth.
Hence, from the given scenario of the question,
Mirembe's complications were most likely a result of female genital mutilation .
He must have probably realised that he will lose nothing by watching and might gain something by watching it.
Answer:
positive reinforcement.
Explanation:
Positive reinforcement is a type of reinforcement , and it means giving a thing to a person as a reward after performing a desired action or work.
Examples of positive reinforcement include giving biscuit to a child as an encouragement or compensation for a job well done and getting paid for a completed task.
Other types of reinforcement are
* Negative reinforcement....removing something negative to increasing a response,
* Punishment reinforcement.... means addition of something aversive to decrease a behavior,
* Extinction reinforcement......is the removal of a thing to decrease a behavior.
In this case, the $10.00 received by kelly for every 110 clowns she completed, is an example of positive reinforcement.
Roman citizens were too angry about political corruption to fight.
