False i think.... i learned it last year
Answer:
A falacy masquerading as a valid inference
Explanation:
Assume that the premise(s) of the following argument are true. Apply the other three tests of the worthiness of an argument in their proper order: "We've lost six games in a row; our luck is probably going to change today." That argument is an example of A falacy masquerading as a valid inference
Ottawa, Canada.
Thank you for letting me answer your question here on brainly. I like to help people as much as I can, so please let me now if my answers provide any help to you. It means a lot to me to know that my questions help provide support to people in the community to need help. If you want extra help, you can PM me! I get lot of PMs tough, so it might take a while to respond, my apologies.I also cannot assure you that i will know the answer, but I am willing to try to help you. Thanks for reading this, and have a great day! ~ brainly user, Lillyxrose
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "c. motivational." The thesis statement for your motivational speech should state what you want the audience to learn. Making a motivational speech entails a big responsibility that at the end you left a mark or legacy to your audience that they will easily remember you.
Answer:
The correct answer is, in fact, the last one; citizens expecting to pay higher taxes for more oversight.
Explanation:
This answer comes with the understanding that negative externalities is a concept from economy especially related to the way that the economy of a country, region, or the planet itself, will be affected through the use of renewable and non-renewable resources. This concept talks about the overcosts, or benefits, that are generated through the correct use of renewable vs. non-renewable resources, and which will affect especially the future generations. As such, the fact that citizens should have to pay more taxes to increase oversight on companies so that the non-renewable resources are not depleted further, negatively impacts them and thus they would, of course, object to this.