Answer:
(a) Labor productivity is 0.0096 rugs/dollar
(b) Multifactor productivity is 0.244 rugs/dollar
Explanation:
(a) Labor productivity = total output/total labor input = 85 rugs/($17×520) = 0.0096 rugs/dollar
(b) Solvent productivity = 85 rugs/($5×100) = 0.17 rugs/dollar
Machine rental productivity = 85 rugs/($60×22) = 0.0644 rugs/dollar
Multifactor productivity = 0.0096+0.17+0.0644 = 0.244 rugs/dollar
Answer:
Labour productivity at an anniversary celebration = 43.75
Labour productivity at a wedding reception = 115
Labour productivity is higher at the wedding reception.
Explanation:
Labour productivity is the ratio of output to labour
Labour productivity at an anniversary celebration = 350 / 8 = 43.75
Labour productivity at a wedding reception = 230 / 2 = 115
Labour productivity is higher at the wedding reception. Less labour produces more more meals.
This can be explained by the law of diminishing marginal returns
the law of diminishing returns states that as more units of a variable input is added to a fixed income of production, output might increase at a point but after some time total output would increase at a decreasing rate and marginal product would be decreasing.
Answer:
the maximum that paid to acquire bakery is $336,672.
Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
= (Value of local bakery + Present value of cost savings) × (1 - discount) × ( 1 + premium) × willing stake of bakery
= ($750,000 + $50,000) × (1 - 0.20) × (1 + 0.05) × 0.501
= $336,672
Therefore, the maximum that paid to acquire bakery is $336,672.
We simply applied the above formula
Answer:
$2449
Explanation:
Alex wants to measure the nominal 1998 GDP of $993 billion in 2008 dollars.
Also the deflator for 1998 is 30 and for 2008, it is 74
Now he avoids making a misleading calculation
Therefore, the the nominal 1998 GDP of $993 billion in 2008 dollars
= 993/30×74= $2449.4≅$2449
C. A decrease in the money supply
Nearly 700 banks failed in waning months of 1929 and more than 3,000 collapsed in 1930. Federal deposit insurance was as-yet unheard of, so when the banks failed, people lost all their money. Some people panicked, causing bank runs as people desperately withdrew their money, forcing more banks to close. By the end of the decade, more than 9,000 banks had failed. Surviving institutions, unsure of the economic situation and concerned for their own survival, became unwilling to lend money. This exacerbated the situation, leading to less and less spending.