Answer:
A. more information should be gathered before deciding on which project, if either, is desirable.
Explanation:
The lower Payback Period is not sufficient information to decide which project is more profitable. The payback period indicates when in the life of a project the initial investment principal cash flow is achieved.
But to decide about a certain project it is better to know the interest yield, it is also important to get the life of the project and other information.
For example:
a.- 250 investment 100 per year payback in 2.5-year life 3 years
b.- 500 investment 100 per year payback in 5-year life 20 years
While A payback occurs before project B is better
Answer:
B) complements
Explanation:
The cross elasticity shows a relationship between the percentage change in quantity demanded with the percentage change in the price.
In case of the substitute goods, the relation between the price and the quantity demanded is positive that means if the price of goods increased than the quantity demanded is also increased
And, In case of the complementary goods, the relation between the price and the quantity demanded is negative that means if the price of goods increased than the quantity demanded is decreased
According to the given situation, the most appropriate option is B.
Answer:
pull strategies
Explanation:
A pull tactic is a method used to get one to the consumer. Rather of pressing the company into the client, pull approach includes the use of pull strategies or knowledge exchange to draw the consumer. Such clients would also continue selling the company for you.
The industry words pushing and pulling emerged in manufacturing and business process planning, but are now commonly used in promotions, as well as becoming a concept commonly used in hospitality delivery. Walmart is indeed an example of a corporation employing the push vs. pull technique.
Answer:
Net income allocated to sally is $112000
Explanation:
Sally invested $200000 and Andy invested $100000, which means Andy's investment is half of Sally's investment. So he will receive the half of what Sally will get.
Let
Sally's pay be x
Andy's pay be x/2
Total Net income is 168000 dollars.
So, putting it in an equation, we get
(x+x/2)=168000
x(1+0.5)=168000
x(1.5)=168000
x= 168000/1.5
x=112000
So Sally's share will be $112000
Andy's share will be x/2
=112000/2
=56000
So Andy share will be $56000
Answer:
Both restaurant will clean up
Explanation:
In the table below the first number in the parentheses belongs to All-You-Can-Eat Café? and the second number belongs to GoodGrub Diner . And the titles (Clean Up and Not Clean) represents their options separately.
GoodGrub Diner
Clean Up Not Clean
All-You-Can-Eat Café? Clean Up (11 000, 11 000) (18 000, 6 000)
Not Clean (6 000, 18 000) (14 000, 14 000)
If All-You-Can-Eat Café? cleans up, GoodGrub Diner will earn 11 000 dollars by cleaning up verses 6 000 dollars by not cleaning. And if All-You-Can-Eat Café? doesn’t clean, GoodGrub Diner will earn 18 000 dollars by cleaning up verses 14 000 dollars by not cleaning. Similarly All-You-Can-Eat Café? will be better off by cleaning up both in the case where GoodGrub Diner cleans up and in the case where GoodGrub Diner doesn’t clean, comparing with the cases All-You-Can-Eat Café? doesn’t clean.
Each restaurant adopts the strategy that is best for itself regardless of which strategy the other restaurant chooses. This is called the Nash equilibrium.