Students who party before an exam are twice as likely to fail as those who don't party (and presumably study). If 20% of the stu
1 answer:
Answer:
The fraction of the students who failed to went partying =
Step-by-step explanation:
Let total number of students = 100
No. of students partied are twice the no. of students who not partied.
⇒ No. of students partied = 2 × the no. of students who are not partied
No. of students partied before the exam = 20 % of total students
⇒ No. of students partied before the exam = × 100
⇒ No. of students partied before the exam = 20
No. of students who not partied before the exam =
Thus the fraction of the students who failed to went partying =
You might be interested in
Answer:
500 lb
Step-by-step explanation:
You have to make a proportion:
77 lb is part of the whole weight ( which we don't know) so 77 will go on top
The problem tells us that 15.4% of the total weight is pecans so 15.4 will go over 100 (since % are out of 100)
Then you cross multiply giving you: 7700 = 15.4x
then you divide 15.4 to both sides to isolate x which will give you 500
Mr. Jackson invested $800 at 6% per year and $ 2400 at 4 % per year
<h3><u>Solution:</u></h3>Mr. Jackson invested a sum of money at 6% per year, and 3 times as much at 4% per year.
Let the sum invested be ‘a’ and ‘3a’ at 6% per year and 4 % per year respectively
Also, his annual return totaled $144
We can form following equation on the basis of question:-
a = $800
The amount of money invested at 6% = a = 800
The amount of money invested at 4 % = 3a = 3(800) = 2400
So, the amount of money invested at 6% is $800 and the amount of money invested at 4% is $ 2400
Answer:
a) (0.5256,0.5944)
c) Criticism is invalid
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 560
Proportion of mislabeled = 56%
a) 90% Confidence interval:
Putting the values, we get:
b) Interpretation of confidence interval:
We are 90% confident that the true proportion of all seafood in the country that is mislabeled or misidentified is between 0.5256 and 0.5944 that is 52.56% and 59.44%.
c) Validity of criticism
Conditions for validity:
Verification:
Both the conditions are satisfied. This, the criticism is invalid.