Answer:
Big Five model
Explanation:
The Big Five model also known as the Five Factor Model (FFM) or Ocean or Canoe model is a way of grouping human behavior/traits. This behavior or traits are subject to relationship between words.
The Ocean or Canoe (OCEAN/CANOE) abbreviation is a combination of the first letters of the words of the the five(big five) traits.
Openness to experience, Conscientiousness, Extroversion, Agreeableness, emotional stability(Neuroticism). It can also be rearranged to form CANOE as well.
This five traits are also affected by the upbringing or family cultures as well. Anyone described with any of the above word is most likely to have attributes that exemplify the meaning of the words.
I hope this helps.
Leslie's budget is hurting in the areas of transportation, groceries, phone and dining out.
<u>Explanation:</u>
For transportation, cash is required for every day. So Leslie is spending more on transportation every month. Forgoing back and forth out anyplace she will burn through cash on transportation.
She is likewise spending cash on goods. Staple goods will be an essential one for living these days. So the financial backing is harming here.
She is spending another hand on the telephone and eating out. For the telephone, she will energize each month. She will feast out with companions each day.
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:
It is given that,
price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can
price of a hamburger(y) = $2
Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4
Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6
Hence,
4 > 3
Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.
Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.
So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.
Answer:
<u>No</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember, </em>in business law, as long as both parties did not sign a contractual document, the purchase is not legal.
In this case, it could be observed that Ganze only "mailed an acceptance" not a signed document between both parties agreeing on the purchase of her antique car.
Also, the fact that she quickly sent a telegram letting Archer know that she is rejecting the offer, shows that she acted in good fate to withdraw her acceptance on time.
