Answer:
It has to be Timmy and it is 412.
Step-by-step explanation:
Uh I did it in my head and it is really hard to explain.
Answer:
43.2in
Step-by-step explanation:
If the two people are equally proportional, then knowing the size of the waist of one of them, we gonna we be able to know the other's wais size, by the relation.
36in*(1*20%) = 36in*1.2 = 43.2in
If the triangles are congruent, the angle opposite the 32 cm side will have the same measure as angle E, 40°. An appropriate choice for this question is ...
b. The measure of c is 40.
_____
In actual fact, the triangles not only are not congruent, they cannot exist. The total of sides FG and FE (82 cm) is less than the length of side GE (38 in). 82 cm is about 32.3 inches, about 5.7 inches too short.
Even if you overlook the units problem, the sum of squares of the sides of the triangle is 32² +38² = 2468, somewhat short of 50² = 2500. That is, the largest angle is slightly more than 90°. It is closer to 90.754° ≈ 91°.
You can label a diagram any way you want, but that doesn't mean the numbers are consistent or sensible.
Answer:
- Keisha’s experimental probability is 1/50.
- When the inventory is 4000 clocks, the prediction is that 3920 clocks will work.
- Keisha will have more than 97% of the products working.
Step-by-step explanation:
These are three prediction that Keisha can make based on the report that said 6 of 300 clocks tested weren't working.
Base on that information, Keisha can calculate an experimental probability, dividing <em>clocks that don't work properly </em>by <em>the total amount of clocks</em><em>:</em>
<em>
</em>
Therefore, the probability of success is 100% - 2% = 98%.
This means that Keisha has a probability of having 98% of all clocks functioning properly. So, she can make the prediction:<em> from 4000 clocks, 3920 will work. </em>Also, she can predict that she will actually have more than 97% working, because the experimental probability is higher than that.