Answer:
No, because Rachel's family farm does not employ outside workers
Explanation:
No, because Rachel's family farm does not employ outside workers. Under the OSH Act since Rachel's family does not employ outside workers they are not seen as an official business and therefore are not protected under the act. The workers on the farm are not seen as employees but instead family members helping one another and acting as co-owners of the farm. Therefore, the act does would not provide any coverage to Rachel in this scenario.
Answer:
Fightin' Blue Hens Corporation
Income Statement
For the year ended December 31, 2021
Service Revenue $420,000
Operating expenses:
- Salaries Expense $320,000
- Rent Expense $16,000
- Depreciation Expense $32,000 <u>($368,000)</u>
Operating income $52,000
Other revenues and expenses:
- Interest Expense $4,200 <u> ($4,200)</u>
Net income before taxes $47,800
*The totals of the trial balance sheet were added incorrectly, they both debit and credit total $876,600.
Answer:
Dr. Freight-in $28
Dr. Supplies Expense $42
Dr. Entertainment of Clients $65
Dr. Postage Expense $30
Dr. Cash Short/over $3
Cr. Cash (200-32) $168
Explanation:
Petty cash is kept to deal with the day to day expense of the business. It is kept separate from the cash balance of the company.
To replenish the fund we, need to record the petty cash expenses in their respective accounts and deduct the amount from petty cash account.
If the cash is short or over the balance shown in the account we also need to record it.
Answer:
Present Value = $290.20
Explanation:
The present value of a future payment can be calculated with the following formula:
PV = FV / (1 + i)N
Where i is the annual interest rate or discount rate, and t is the number of years until the payment will be received.
PV = Present Value = ?
FV = Payment = $4,400
i = 8.3% = 0.083
N = 20 - 6 = 14
PV = $4400 / (1 + 0.083)(20 - 6)
PV = $4400 / (1.083 * 14)
PV = $4400 / 15.162
PV = $290.1992
Present Value = $290.20 (Approximated)
Answer:
A) -0.55
B) The negativity in the estimated elasticity suggests that for every 1% increase in the price of transport there will be a corresponding 0.55% decrease in the number of Commuters
Explanation:
Given data:
current fare (P0) = $4
hiked fare (P1) = $6
change in fare = $2
number of rides before increase ( Q0 ) = 10000
number of rides after increase ( Q1 ) = 8000
change in rides = 2000
A) The estimated elasticity of demand for MRT rides using the midpoint /ARC method
Mid point method = [ ( Q1 - Q0 ) / ( Q1 + Q0 ) ] / [ (P1 - P0 ) / (P1 + P0 ) ]
= [ - 2000 / 18000 ] / [ 2 / 10 ]
= - 1000 / 1800 = - 5 / 9 ( estimated elasticity )
= - 0.55
B) The negativity in the estimated elasticity suggests that for every 1% increase in the price of transport there will be a corresponding 0.55% decrease in Commuters
