Based on the description above, the following analyses can be made:
1. Clarissa's concern is addressing t<span>he study's construct validity
2. Quinn's </span>concern is addressing the study's external validity
3. Manish's concern is addressing the study’s statistical validity
In addition, you may be asked, for what it means if Anton is concerned that the researcher made a Type I error. The answer to that would be that the researcher concluded there was a relationship between bullying and self-esteem<span>, whereas there is really no relationship.</span>
Answer:
There were 2 primary types of government, a democracy, and a hierarchy. A hierarchy had a few different variants, the ruler had all power and was a god, the ruler controlled people, and the ruler had the most power but had a small house of other "government officials"
If I had a kingdom, it would have a democracy as its government. A group of advisors, the house/senate, and what many think is the ultimate power but has equal power, the president/king. Democracy is important. Not too much though, or else you get communism. Now, things were different back then. Most people kept what they had, and the citizens ran their own "government" of sorts. But a democratic government is still needed to control, and maintain the people. When I say control, I don't mean "give me all of your money and earnings and we will give you what you earned in food, water, clothes, and a house." That's communism. What I mean by control, is enforce the rules, make sure that the people don't tear each other apart, limb from limb. The people need guided to the decided way of living, which THEY CHOSE by voting. Therefore, they chose to follow these guidelines, and should not argue. That is how to run a stable government. On paper. Of course, there would be plenty of people who want to cause problems, but those things are too unpredictable to handle without communism. Not saying that it is the only way to run a government, what I meant was those things will be deal with at the time and can't be fixed on a simple word document for a history lesson on a computer learning system meant for a sixth grader to answer in a few sentences, about why you should be good to people, and not meant to go into detail about communism, and meant to see who understands how to live a happy human life, and who knows how to be the next "president" of Russia, and also just to see students creativity and knowledge of world politics as well as their downright opinion. I probably went into a lot of detail but hit the word limit.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
Analysis of the fossilization process from the organism's death to the discovery of the fossil.
Examples include:
- The marks of the teeth,
- the butchery,
- the gastrointestinal enzymes that leave the mark,
- where the fossil is the product of death,
- broken bones.
Four examples of taphonomic evidence that might indicate that an ancient animal represented by fossils was killed by a crocodile are
- Punctures, bisected points,
- hook grades, poor nibbling,
- entire unbroken bones left behind.
The place where it was found, and the time period which it was found in.
Species closely connected to the past may have the same / similar preferences, and examining at just how they consume / live will provide us with data on how past species have survived.
Provides evidence of what you consume and how you feed your food. If there were too many predators, it also describes migratory behaviors. Informs us the environmental hazards.
Yes, i agree. If it can't be the same individual on various layers of rock
Answer: Despite being strange but it's still normal
Explanation:
Most people would love to question those who come around them to get the basis on what they are doing. It would not be caring not to ask some kind of questions, although they may seems akward but it wouldn't be out of place not to ask, as asking would make you understand very well why the fellow did what he or she did or is doing.
