Answer:
34°
Step-by-step explanation:
If m∠ADE is with 34° smaller than m∠CAB, then denote
m∠ADE=x°,
m∠CAB=(x+34)°.
Since DE ║ AB, then
m∠ADE=m∠DAB=x°.
AD is angle A bisector, then
m∠EAD=m∠DAB=x°.
Thus,
m∠CAB=m∠CAD+m∠DAB=(x+x)°=2x°.
On the other hand,
m∠CAB=(x+34)°,
then
2x°=(x+34)°,
m∠ADE=x°=34°.
890×(1+0.187÷12)^(12)−890×(1+0.125÷12)^(12)=63.61....answer
Answer:
Conclusion
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean for EBR is 
The sample mean for Ascension parish is 
The p-value is 
The level of significance is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Here
is the population mean for Ascension parish
From the data given values we see that

So we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So we conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Answer:
a,d,e
Step-by-step explanation:
Question says that "Last week, Jason ran 26.1 miles. He wants to run further this week. He plans to run 2.4 miles to the park, four times around the park, and 2.4 miles back from the park. To represent that inequality, he wrote: 2.4 + 4p + 2.4 ___ 26.1"
We see a blank space before 26.1.
So we need to fill the suitable inequality symbol from <, >, ≤ and ≥.
In given expression "2.4 + 4p + 2.4 ___ 26.1", left side part "2.4 + 4p + 2.4", represents the total length of the path that Jason wants to cover this week.
He has decided to run more than 26.1 miles so that means the sum "2.4 + 4p + 2.4" must be greater than 26.1 miles.
Hence we will use > symbol so that left side becomes greater than the right side part.
So the final answer will be :
2.4 + 4p + 2.4 > 26.1