Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

10

The image of trapezoid PQRS after a reflection across Line W Y is trapezoid P'Q'R'S'. 2 trapezoids are shown. Line W Y is the li

ne of reflection. Line segment R R prime has a midpoint at point Z. Line segment S S prime has a midpoint at point X. What is m? 45º 90º 180º 270º

2 answers:

RoseWind [281]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

90

Step-by-step explanation:

harina [27]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

90

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

You are having a meeting with the CEO of a soda company. You have interpreted the number of cans of soda produced versus profit

LenaWriter [7]

The shape of the graph is similar to the letter W; however, the region of interest will lie on the right of the origin, which means only the right half of the W(a negative number of cans cannot be produced). The profit produced will be maximized if the number of cans produced is greater than 3. The company will be at a loss if the number of cans produced is near 2.5. The break even situations are present if the company produces 2 or 3 cans.

4 0

2 years ago

The vertices of polygon ABCD are at A(1, 1), B(2, 3), C(3, 2), and D(2, 1). ABCD is reflected across the x-axis and translated 2

Lana71 [14]

-- Reflecting across the x-axis makes all the x-coordinates the negative of
what they were before the reflection. The y-coordinates don't change.

-- Translating 2 units up makes all the y-coordinates 2 greater than
they were before the translation. The x-coordinates don't change.

You didn't give us a list of new coordinates, so there's nothing
to match with.

8 0

2 years ago

Test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, and then state the concl

never [62]

Answer:

a) Failed to reject the null hypothesis (P-value=0.09).

b) The 95% CI for the difference in proportions is:

$-0.0599\leq\pi_1-\pi_2\leq0.0124$

Step-by-step explanation:

a) We have to perform a hypothesis test for the difference of proportions.

The null and alternative hypothesis are:

$H_0: \pi_1\geq\pi_2\\\\H_1: \pi_1$

The significance level is 0.05.

The proportion of the passenger cars owners is:

$p_1=\frac{239}{2142} =0.1116$

The proportion of commercial truck owners is:

$p_2=\frac{54}{399}=0.1353$

The weigthed average p is

$p=\frac{n_1p_1+n_2p_2}{n_1+n_2}=\frac{239+54}{2142+399}=0.1153$

The estimated standard deviation is

$s=\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\frac{p(1-p)}{n_2}} =\sqrt{\frac{0.1153(1-0.1153)}{2142}+\frac{0.1153(1-0.1153)}{399}} =0.0174$

We can calculate the z-value as:

$z=\frac{\Delta p}{s}=\frac{0.1116-0.1353}{0.0174}=-1.362$

The P-value for z=-1.362 is P=0.0866.

The P-value (0.09) is greater than the significance level (0.05), so it failed to reject the null hypothesis. There is no enough evidence to prove that commercial trucks owners violate laws requiring front license plates at a higher rate than owners of passenger cars.

b) We can construct a 95% CI, according to the significance level of 0.05.

The z-value for this CI is 1.96.

We have to recalculate the standard deviation:

$\sigma=\sqrt{\frac{p_1(1-p_1)}{n_1} +\frac{p_2(1-p_2)}{n_2}} =\sqrt{\frac{0.1116(1-0.1116)}{2142} +\frac{0.1353(1-0.1353)}{399}} =0.0184$

The lower limit is then:

$LL=(p_1-p_2)-z*\sigma=(0.1116-0.1353)-1.96*0.0184=-0.0238-0.0361\\\\LL=-0.0599$

The upper limit is:

$UL=(p_1-p_2)+z*\sigma=(0.1116-0.1353)+1.96*0.0184=-0.0238+0.0361\\\\UL=0.0124$

The 95% CI for the difference in proportions is:

$-0.0599\leq\pi_1-\pi_2\leq0.0124$

In this case, we can conclude that the difference between the proportions, with 95% confidence, can still be equal or greater than zero, meaning that it is possible passenger car owners violate laws more than truck owners.

7 0

2 years ago

A savings account deposit of $300 is to earn 5.8% interest. After how many years will the investment be worth $900?

KatRina [158]

900=300(1+0.058)^t divide each side by 300
3=1.059^t
Log(3)=t*log(1.058)
T=log(3)/log(1.058)
T==19.5 years

7 0

2 years ago

Unit 3 parallel and perpendicular lines homework 4 parallel line proofs

Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

1) c ║ d by consecutive interior angles theorem

2) m∠3 + m∠6 = 180° by transitive property

3) ∠2 ≅ ∠5 by definition of congruency

4) t ║ v ${}$ Corresponding angle theorem

5) ∠14 and ∠11 are supplementary ${}$ Definition of supplementary angles

6) ∠8 and ∠9 are supplementary ${}$ Consecutive interior angles theorem

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Statement ${}$ Reason

m∠4 + m∠7 = 180° ${}$ Given

m∠4 ≅ m∠6 ${}$ Vertically opposite angles

m∠4 = m∠6 ${}$ Definition of congruency

m∠6 + m∠7 = 180° ${}$ Transitive property

m∠6 and m∠7 are supplementary ${}$ Definition of supplementary angles

∴ c ║ d ${}$ Consecutive interior angles theorem

2) Statement ${}$ Reason

m∠3 = m∠8 ${}$ Given

m∠8 + m∠6 = 180° ${}$ Sum of angles on a straight line

∴ m∠3 + m∠6 = 180° ${}$ Transitive property

3) Statement ${}$ Reason

p ║ q ${}$ Given

∠1 ≅ ∠5 ${}$ Given

∠1 = ∠5 ${}$ Definition of congruency

∠2 ≅ ∠1 ${}$ Alternate interior angles theorem

∠2 = ∠1 ${}$ Definition of congruency

∠2 = ∠5 ${}$ Transitive property

∠2 ≅ ∠5 ${}$ Definition of congruency.

4) Statement ${}$ Reason

∠1 ≅ ∠5 ${}$ Given

∠3 ≅ ∠4 ${}$ Given

∠1 = ∠5 ${}$ Definition of congruency

∠3 = ∠4 ${}$ Definition of congruency

∠5 ≅ ∠4 ${}$ Vertically opposite angles

∠5 = ∠4 ${}$ Definition of congruency

∠5 = ∠3 ${}$ Transitive property

∠1 = ∠3 ${}$ Transitive property

∠1 ≅ ∠3 ${}$ Definition of congruency.

t ║ v ${}$ Corresponding angle theorem

5) Statement ${}$ Reason

∠5 ≅ ∠16 ${}$ Given

∠2 ≅ ∠4 ${}$ Given

∠5 = ∠16 ${}$ Definition of congruency

∠2 = ∠4 ${}$ Definition of congruency

EF ║ GH ${}$ Corresponding angle theorem

∠14 ≅ ∠16 ${}$ Corresponding angles

∠14 = ∠16 ${}$ Definition of congruency

∠5 = ∠14 ${}$ Transitive property

∠5 + ∠11 = 180° ${}$ Sum of angles on a straight line

∠14 + ∠11 = 180° ${}$ Transitive property

∠14 and ∠11 are supplementary ${}$ Definition of supplementary angles

6) Statement ${}$ Reason

l ║ m ${}$ Given

∠4 ≅ ∠7 ${}$ Given

∠4 = ∠7 ${}$ Definition of congruency

∠2 ≅ ∠7 ${}$ Alternate angles

∠2 = ∠7 ${}$ Definition of congruency

∠2 = ∠4 ${}$ Transitive property

∠2 ≅ ∠4 ${}$ Definition of congruency

∠2 and ∠4 are corresponding angles ${}$ Definition

DA ║ EB ${}$ Corresponding angle theorem

∠8 and ∠9 are consecutive interior angles ${}$ Definition

∠8 and ∠9 are supplementary ${}$ Consecutive interior angles theorem.

6 0

2 years ago