Answer:
- Effective, but not efficient.
Explanation:
Leadership is associated with a blend of effective as well efficient performance to attain the quality goals within a specified time-limit.
As per the given description, Brenda would be called an <u>'effective, but not efficient'</u> manager as she, however, produced the desired quality results effectively but could not ensure the 'maximum utilization of time'(as she took more time as compared to the other managers). This wastage or not using time efficiently demonstrates that she was effective but not efficient as she failed to employ the resources in the supreme possible manner.
Answer:
Social situations can create an awareness of problems that demand attention, information about which may be sought through the media.
Explanation:
Whenever a certain social situation occurs, there would be conflicting opinion on how people would perceive those situations.
Most people generally would want to find instant gratifications by reading the news about that social situation presented in a way that cater to their personal opinion.
This type of behavior make most media realize that they can modify the way they presented the news in order to target specific demographic regardless of the truth.
The problem was: Ratings has slipped; they were no longer seen as <span>creative
</span><span>The merchant of cool told a story about people who work in a TV station that focused their life on finding the trend that would attract the attention of Youth Audiences. This revolves around MTV that struggled to find their new identity as a station after the video music market was dominated by internet.</span>
Answer: A) no damages from the driver
Explanation:
CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE is a defence where a person is ruled to have contributed to whatever injury there may have sustained in the matter at hand, through their own negligence.
When this happens, the plaintiff is COMPLETELY BARRED from receiving any form of compensation from the Defense.
This is a particularly harsh doctrine that has been abolished in many Common Law countries who instead now follow the COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE approach where the Plaintiff's claim is reduced by the percentage they contributed to the accident. In this case their claim would be reduced by 20% leading to $80,000 being paid by the Defendant.
