<span>This is latent learning. With this concept, there is often no overt expression of understanding of a task. In addition, reinforcement of the behavior will cause the learned behavior to be exhibited just as quickly as if the reinforcement took place at every trial or task.</span>
Answer:
groupthink
Explanation:
Asterisk Inc. decided to change some of its policies. Jensen, a team manager, conducted a meeting to inform his team about the management's decision. During the meeting, the majority of Jensen's team members were in favor of the policies except Sandy. As a result, Sandy decided not to voice her concerns about the policy changes fearing negative consequences. This scenario illustrates the concept of <u>groupthink</u>.
Groupthink is based on the desire not to upset the balance/harmony of a group of people thinking about a situation, it is a phenomenon whereby a group of individuals reach a premature consensus on an issue without critical reasoning or evaluation of the consequences or alternatives in a bid to avoid dissenting views and opinion. It is a situation whereby harmony in a group is promoted more than critical and objective analysis of issues.
Answer:
Group decision making provides two advantages over decisions made by individuals: synergy and sharing of information. Synergy is the idea that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. When a group makes a decision collectively, its judgment can be keener than that of any of its members.
Explanation:
Answer:
Paincho is the process of sharing goods and needs with neighbors when they need and Parma is the process of helping the neighbors with labours and doing some of their works ..So it is said that Parma and paincho are traditional system of cooperation..
Answer:
B. seemingly minor differences in the wording of a question can convey vastly different meanings to survey respondents.
Explanation:
The fact that public support for government policies declines dramatically when calling the policies "welfare" rather than "assistance for the poor" illustrates that seemingly minor differences in the wording of a question can convey vastly different meanings to survey respondents.
Respondents may find the word welfare derogatory while assistance to the poor seems more acceptable. This could lead to a decline in the support of the public.
