The diagram shows two different buttons and their weights.
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Hey there!
The easiest way I could think to do this is by converting your mixed number to an improper fraction and multiplying the fraction by 2, or 2 over 1.
To multiply fractions, you can just multiply the numerators and denominators and simplify, if applicable.
Since you can't simplify this fraction in its improper form, just convert it back into a mixed number.
So, your answer will be
.
Hope this helped you out! :-)
The easiest way I could think to do this is by converting your mixed number to an improper fraction and multiplying the fraction by 2, or 2 over 1.
To multiply fractions, you can just multiply the numerators and denominators and simplify, if applicable.
Since you can't simplify this fraction in its improper form, just convert it back into a mixed number.
So, your answer will be
Hope this helped you out! :-)
Answer:
we cannot conclude hat the proportion of wives married less than two years who planned to have children is significantly higher than the proportion of wives married five years
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that in a study on the fertility of married women conducted by Martin O’Connell and Carolyn C. Rogers for the Census Bureau in 1979, two groups of childless wives aged 25 to 29 were selected at random, and each was asked if she eventually planned to have a child. One group was selected from among wives married less than two years and the other from among wives married five years.
Let X be the group married less than 2 years and Y less than 5 years
X Y Total
Sample size 300 300 600
Favouring 240 288 528
p 0.8 0.96 0.88
p difference = -0.16
Std error for difference =
Test statistic = p difference/std error=-6.03
p value <0.000001
Since p is less than alpha 0.05 we cannot conclude hat the proportion of wives married less than two years who planned to have children is significantly higher than the proportion of wives married five years