Answer:
In the description section underneath the overview per the particular context is illustrated.
Explanation:
- Wanda's philosophy about becoming a distributer of enhance performance resulted in increased market demand due to consumer perception that her goods are stronger and therefore more advantageous.
- This contributes to consumption growth, moving the consumer surplus towards Wanda's goods to the right, contributing towards increased costs.
- One more scenario maybe though in the immediate future, her Wanda commodities demonstrate no positive effects, resulting throughout a decline in terms of trade.
Throughout this situation, Wanda might answer by genuinely changing the productivity of the latter's goods including displaying a certain clinical significance to obtain a competitive advantage for customers.
Answer:
I would say false
Explanation:
the charger is like an appliance . if it isn't in use it's harmless . I don't know for sure.
Answer: A. the 99 principle
Explanation:
This strategy, often called "charm pricing," involves using pricing that ends in "9" and "99."
With charm pricing, the left digit is reduced from a round number by one cent. We come across this technique every time we make purchases but don’t pay attention. For example, your brain processes $3.00 and $2.99 as different values: To your brain $2.99 is $2.00, which is cheaper than $3.00.
How is this technique effective? It all boils down to how a brand converts numerical values. In 2005, Thomas and Morwitz conducted research they called "the left-digit effect in price cognition." They explained that, “Nine-ending prices will be perceived to be smaller than a price one cent higher if the left-most digit changes to a lower level (e.g., $3.00 to $2.99), but not if the left-most digit remains unchanged (e.g., $3.60 to $3.59).”
The agency's position is that Bob had already signed a contract, and that the contract included a placement fee due to the fact that Bob was able to find this job through the agency. On the other hand, the position that Bob would most likely argue is that he is a minor. As a minor, Bob is allowed to disaffirm his contract. Therefore, Bob is likely to win in this dispute.
