Step-by-step explanation:
a) 7!
If there are no restrictions, answer is 7! as it is the permutation of all animals.
b) 4! x 3!
As cats are 6 and Dogs are 5, thus 1st and last must be cats in order to have alternate arrangements. Therefore the only choices are the order of the cats among themselves and the order of the dogs among themselves. There
are 4! permutations of the cats and 3! permutations of the dogs,
so there are a total of 4! x 3! possible arrangements of the suites.
c) 3! x 5!
There are 3! possible arrangements of the dogs among themselves. Now, if we consider the dogs as one ”object” together, then we can think of arranging the 4 cats together with this 1 additional object. There are 5! such arrangements possible, so there are a total of 3! · 5! possible arrangements of the suites.
d) 2 x 4! x 3!
As required that all the cats must be together and all the dogs must be together, either the cats are all before the dogs or the dogs are all before the cats. There are two possible arrangements thus two times of both possibilities is the answer i.e. 2 x 4! x 3!
Answer:
<h2>-1</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:
3 - (n - 1) = 1/2(3n - 4)
Step-by-step explanation:
We want to write three minus the difference of a number and one equals one-half of the difference of three times the same number and four as an equation.
Let the number be n.
The first part is: three minus the difference of a number and one:
3 - (n - 1)
The second part is: one-half of the difference of three times the same number and four:
1/2(3n - 4)
Now, let us equate the first and second parts:
3 - (n - 1) = 1/2(3n - 4)
PS: I really do not understand the options
Answer: see the graphic
Step-by-step explanation:
A. Type I error helps us to conclude that the flight is not profitable, when in fact it is profitable.
B. a = 0.05
C. Type II error does not show that the flight is profitable
Answer:
C. Inverse
Step-by-step explanation:
The second statement is the inverse, because in an inverse, the hypothesis and the conclusion are both negated. In this case, the sun doesnt shine and the people wont be in a good mood, as opposed to the sun will shine, and the people will be in a good mood.