Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

6

Exercise 21-15 Direct materials and direct labor variances LO P2 The following information describes production activities of Me

rcer Manufacturing for the year.
Actual direct materials used 16,000 lbs. at $4.05 per lb.
Actual direct labor used 5,545 hours for a total of $105,355
Actual units produced 30,000
Budgeted standards for each unit produced are 0.50 pounds of direct material at $4.00 per pound and 10 minutes of direct labor at $20 per hour.

Compute the direct materials price and quantity variances

2 answers:

Verdich [7]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Direct materials price variance = $800 Unfavorable

Direct materials quantity variance = $4,000 Unfavorable

Explanation:

Direct materials price variance = Aq×Ap-Aq×Sp

= (16,000×$4.05) - (16,000×$4.00)

= $800 Unfavorable

Direct materials quantity variance = Aq×Sp - Sq×Sp

= (16,000×$4.00) - (30,000×0.50 pounds×$4.00 )

= $4,000 Unfavorable

Molodets [167]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Instructions are below.

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Actual direct materials used 16,000 lbs. at $4.05 per lb.

Actual units produced 30,000

Budgeted standards for each unit produced are 0.50 pounds of direct material at $4.00 per pound.

To calculate the direct material price and quantity variance, we need to use the following formulas:

Direct material price variance= (standard price - actual price)*actual quantity

Direct material price variance= (4 - 4.05)*16,000

Direct material price variance= $800 unfavorable

Direct material quantity variance= (standard quantity - actual quantity)*standard price

Standard quantity= 30,000*0.5= 15,000

Direct material quantity variance= (15,000 - 16,000)*4

Direct material quantity variance= $4,000 unfavorable

You might be interested in

Your uncle holds just one stock, East Coast Bank (ECB). You agree that this stock is relatively safe, but you want to demonstrat

g100num [7]

Complete question:

Assume that your uncle holds just one stock, East Coast Bank (ECB), which he thinks has very little risk. You agree that the stock is relatively safe, but you want to demonstrate that his risk would be even lower if he were more diversified. You obtain the following returns data for West Coast Bank (WCB). Both banks have had less variability than most other stocks over the past 5 years.

Year ECB WCB

2004 40.00% 40.00%

2005 -10.00% 15.00%

2006 35.00% -5.00%

2007 -5.00% -10.00%

2008 15.00% 35.00%

a. What is the expected return and risk of each stock?

b. Measured by the standard deviation of returns, by how much would your uncle's risk have been reduced if he had held a portfolio consisting of 60% in ECB and the remainder in WCB? In other words, what is the difference between portfolio's standard deviation and weighted average of components' standard deviations? (Hint: check the example on page 11-12 on my note).

Solution:

The estimated return of the stock is the average profit.

So the average of ECB is (40-10+35-5+15)/5

= $\frac{75 percent}{5}$

= 15% expected return

WCB expected return = 40+15-5-10+35

= $\frac{75 percent}{5}$

= 15%

They've had the same planned return.

This is generally defined in the Greek letter Mu, (U) A weighted average may also be used to calculate portfolio volatility.

Standard deviation of ECB is $\sqrt{{ sum [(x-U)^2]/5}}$

so for ECB:

$(40-15)^2$ = $25^2$ =6.25%

$(-10-15)^2$ = $-35^2$ = 0.1225

$(35-15)^2$ = $20^2$ = 0.04

$(-5-15)^2$ = $-20^2$ = 0.04

$(15-15)^2$ =0

now 0.0625+0.1225+0.04+0.04+0=0.265

stdev= $\sqrt{(0.265/5)}$ = 0.23

So WCB is the same except in a different order to make things quick I'm only going to add the median again WCB=0.23

Then the 60/40 portfolio will be the "weighted average" of the returns.

portfolio returns

2004: (60%*40%)+(40%*40%) = 40%

2005: (60%*-10%)+(40%*15%) = 0%

2006: (60%*35%)+(40%*-5%) = 19%

2007: (60%*-5%)+(40%*-10%) = -7%

2008:(60%*15%)+(40%*35%) = 23%

we have an average return of (40+19-7+23)/5 = 75/5 =15%

The estimated return of all combined stocks is a better way to do so.

we knew they both had expected returns of 15% so we can say

(60%*15%)+(40%*15%)=15% so the portfolio has an expected return of 15%

Now we do the standard deviation for the whole portfolio and get

$(40-15)^2$ = $25^2$ =6.25%

$(0-15)^2$ = - $25^2$ =6.25%

$(19-15)^2$ = $4^2$ = 0.16%

$(-7-15)^2$ = $-22^2$ = -4.84%

$(23-15)^2$ = $8^2$ = 0.64%

now add them up and get 9.78%

$\sqrt{(9.78%/5)}$ = 13.98%

Therefore, the normal portfolio variance is 13.98 per cent and the predicted portfolio return is 15 per cent.

Every stock has a standard deviation of 23 per cent and an average return of 15 per cent, meaning that the fund has the same estimated return but with less standard deviation. This ensures that the same gain is less costly. It's stronger than any of these products.

5 0

1 year ago

When asked about those people who say his Sriracha sauce is too spicy, David Tran jokingly suggests the "use less" of the produc

just olya [345]

Answer:

An Undifferentiated Approach.

Explanation:

While dealing specifically with the marketing mix (product, price, place, promotion), an undifferentiated approach particularly refers to the situation when an organization provides its customers and market with the same product and offers even without considering the different needs and wants of different customer segments. Organization do not do segmentation and targeting, they believe that one single undifferentiated offer will fulfill the needs of their customers quite effectively.

4 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Determine whether the following statement is true or false, and explain your reasoning:

Triss [41]

Answer:

The statement is true

Explanation:

As a fact, I agree that with large sample sizes, even the small differences between the null value and the observed point estimate can be statistically significant.

To put it differently, any differences between the null value and the observed point estimate will be material and/or significant if the samples are large in shape and form.

It's also established that point estimate get more clearer and understandable, and the difference between the mean and the null value can be easily singled out if the sample size is bigger.

Suffix to say, however, while the difference may connote a statistical importance, the practical implication notwithstanding, will be looked and studied on a different set of rules and procedures, beyond the statistical relevance.

6 0

1 year ago

Hawkins Poultry Farms is considering the purchase of feeding equipment that costs $139,000 and will produce annual cash flows of

pychu [463]

Answer:

NPV = $1,564.65

Explanation:

Here is the full question :

Hawkins Poultry Farms is considering the purchase of feeding equipment that costs $139,000 and will produce annual cash flows of approximately $36,000 for five years. The equipment is expected to be sold at the end of five years for $40,000.

What is the net present value of the proposed investment? Hawkins requires a 15 percent return on all capital investments

Net present value is the present value of after tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.

NPV can be calculated using a financial calculator

Cash flow in year 0 = $-139,000

Cash flow each year from year 1 to 4 = $36,000

Cash flow in year 5 = $36,000 + $40,000 = $76,000.

i = 15%

NPV = $1,564.65

To find the NPV using a financial calculator:

1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.

2. after inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.

3. Press compute

7 0

1 year ago

Read the following sentences. Underline the subjects, and circle the prepositional phrases. The gym is open until nine o’clock t

pentagon [3]

Answer

The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.

Explanation

You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.

7 0

1 year ago