Answer:
Making sure that Shelia understands the economic need for laying-off staff.
Explanation:
Lay-offs and the communication associated with it is never a pleasant topic for the employee who is getting laid-off, but also for the person who is in charge of delivering the message.
The key takeaway when communicating things related to lay-offs is the distinction between <em>lay-offs</em> and <em>employee firing due to bad performance</em>. Lay-offs are never the result of an individual's bad performance or mistakes regarding work, instead, they are always related to business issues, such as mandatory downsizing. All in all, lay-offs are always about <em>economic issues </em>regarding the business.
That's why it is irrelevant to talk about personal traits and the lay-off process since it is not the employee's fault.
Answer:
Increase the consumption of product Y and decrease the consumption of product X.
Explanation:
Utility-maximizing rule states that a consumer is maximizing its utility at a point where the marginal utility per dollar spent equal for both the products.
Marginal utility per dollar for Product X:
= 2 utils per dollar
Marginal utility per dollar for Product Y:
= 8 utils per dollar
Here, the utility-maximizing rule suggests that this consumer should consume more of product Y and less of product X.
Answer:
The correct answer is The global village.
Explanation:
The term "global village" is conceived as the impact that communications have within socio-cultural aspects. This phenomenon goes hand in hand with the spread of telecommunications and the internet, which allows access to information to be carried out at any place and time desired. In this way, ideas and events that occur within another geographical space can be conceived as their own, which directly influences the perception of people as if they lived in a remote place.
Answer:
Answer 1.
Beneath referenced pointers show that organization arranged the liquidation for recent years or something like that.
- The way that there had been no interest in R&D for recent years which more likely than not brought about noteworthy cost putting something aside for the organization.
- BBB bought expanded size of stock on layaway from providers in recent years which is a warning.
- Indeed, even without bringing about any R&D cost for recent years, CFO of BBB moved toward the bank to expand the credit line of the organization and utilized all credit line without legitimate desk work.
- CFO erroneously guaranteed the brokers about new product offering so as to look for advances/increment credit line.
- Indeed, even with diminished deals, organization was indicating lower supply of stock. They more likely than not been offering the stock at cost to outsider or shrouded it at an undisclosed area to dupe the providers.
- With no interest in R&D and declining business possibilities, organization couldn't have given new offers for subsidizing
Answer 2.
Yes, even if it is a fraudulent filing for bankruptcy, BBB organization despite everything can select to petition for financial protection or BBB can close the business through and through and escape with the reserve funds and continues from the offer of the stock. Indeed, even leasers and providers reserve the option to petition for automatic insolvency against the BBB in the event that BBB doesn't seek financial protection.
It thoroughly relies upon the BBB Company, in the event that it selects to declare financial insolvency under section 7, or 11 of the liquidation code. Be that as it may, it is just under section 11 liquidation procedures of the chapter 11 court it very well may be set up that BBB's aim and untrustworthy strategic policies establishes to insolvency misrepresentation.
