Answer: a. Gardening gloves
b. Terracotta planters
c. Garden scissors
d. Watering cans
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Helga runs a website on which she sells houseplants and that she also earns through pay-per-click advertising that allows search engines to show targeted ads on her site.
All the products will be advertised on her website. The gardening gloves, terracotta planters, garden scissors and the watering cans are all materials that are required for plant growth to provide water and keep weeds away.
Answer:
The cost of goods sold = $74,000
Explanation:
<em>Cost of goods sold is computed as</em>
<em>Opening stock + production- closing inventory</em>
<em>The figure is always subtracted from the sales revenue to determine the gross profit</em>
The cost of goods of XXis Corporation
Cost of goods sold = 19,000 + 70,000 - 15,000
= $74,000
The cost of goods sold = $74,000
Answer:
The home must sell for $616,500 to be able to settle all costs
Explanation:
The net to the formula can be used to ascertain the price of the property , the formula is given below:
Net amount=Sales price*(100%-commission rate)
The net to the seller in this case is the amount that seller would receive and be able to settle mortgage and closing costs and still be left with $75000
Net amount =$75000+$450000+$36000
=$561000
commission rate is 9%
$561000=sales price*(100-9%)
$561000=sales price*91%
sales price =$561000/91%
=616483.52
But to the nearest $100 is $616500
Answer:
ECONOMIES OF SCOPE
Explanation:
Economies of Scope concept implies producing different , but related products will reduce the per unit cost of production of the firm (relatively lesser than if the products would have been produced separately.
This happens because of backward & forward linkages in interrelated but different goods' inputs & outputs .
Ex : In this case, another byproduct - molasses has been produced of waste from sugar production, which could have otherwise been purchased input.
Economies of Production is cost reduction due to quantity & not variety production. Diseconomies of Scale & Diseconomies of Scope are their opposite phenomenas leading to cost rise . So , none of these 3 are apt.
Industry sales = $15 billions
Acme market share = 20%
Emca market share = 17%
Acme market share in form of sales:
Acme marker share = 20% of $20 billion = (20/100)*20 = $3.00 billions
Emca market share in form of sales:
Emca market share = 17% of $20 billions = (17/100)*20 = $2.55 billions
Difference between the market shares for two companies as a percentage:
Difference = |20%-17%| = 3% of $20 billion
