I WILL MAKE WHOEVER ANSWERS THIS CORRECTLY THE BRAINLIEST :D Rei is barricading a door to stop a horde of zombies. She stacks bo
xes of books on a table in front of the door. Each box weighs 30 kilograms, and the table with 8 boxes on top weighs a total of 310 kilograms. The total weight W of the barricade in kilograms is a function of x, the number of boxes Rei stacks on the table. Write the function's formula.
Well first, we need to find the weight of the table. We know that 8 boxes weighs a total of 240kg (since each box weights 30kg). Thus, we can conclude that the table weighs 70kg by doing 310-240=70.Now, we can write our function. Let equal the amount of boxes.
The table is a set weight, so that would be our constant so, we will have: 30x represents the weight each box of book adds to the total. One box equals 30kg, 2 boxes equal 60kg, etc.The 70 represents the unchanging weight of the table.In terms of W(x), it will be:
Well first, we need to find the weight of the table. We know that 8 boxes weighs a total of 240kg (since each box weights 30kg). Thus, we can conclude that the table weighs 70kg by doing 310-240=70.
Now, we can write our function. Let equal the amount of boxes.
The table is a set weight, so that would be our constant.
Thus, we will have:
30x represents the weight each box of book adds to the total. One box equals 30kg, 2 boxes equal 60kg, etc.
The 70 represents the unchanging weight of the table.
The simplest fraction for is . Write the upper bound as a fraction with the same denominator:
.
Hence the range for would be:
.
If the denominator of is also , then the range for its numerator (call it ) would be . Apparently, no whole number could fit into this interval. The reason is that the interval is open, and the difference between the bounds is less than .
To solve this problem, consider scaling up the denominator. To make sure that the numerator of the bounds are still whole numbers, multiply both the numerator and the denominator by a whole number (for example, 2.)
.
.
At this point, the difference between the numerators is now . That allows a number ( in this case) to fit between the bounds. However, can't be written as finite decimals.
Try multiplying the numerator and the denominator by a different number.
.
.
.
.
.
.
It is important to note that some expressions for can be simplified. For example, because of the common factor .
Step-by-step explanation: going down would mean it's negative, so -60, and you're comparing the feet by the amount of minutes so dividing it by 2 which would be -30. so the answer would be c, -60/2=-30
In this question, we are asked to give an expression to represent how much money was left after Sarah had bought some certain stuffs at some prices using the money she received at her birthday.
Firstly, we identify that the total amount of money she has to spend is $55.
Now let’s project her total spendings. She bought 3 shirts with each shirt costing $m.
The total amount spent on the shirts is thus; 3 * $m = $3m
The amount of money she has left is the difference.