I tell you these facts about a mystery number, $c$: $\bullet$ $1.5 < c < 2$ $\bullet$ $c$ can be written as a fraction wit
h one digit for the numerator and one digit for the denominator. $\bullet$ Both $c$ and $1/c$ can be written as finite (non-repeating) decimals. What is this mystery number?
The simplest fraction for is . Write the upper bound as a fraction with the same denominator:
.
Hence the range for would be:
.
If the denominator of is also , then the range for its numerator (call it ) would be . Apparently, no whole number could fit into this interval. The reason is that the interval is open, and the difference between the bounds is less than .
To solve this problem, consider scaling up the denominator. To make sure that the numerator of the bounds are still whole numbers, multiply both the numerator and the denominator by a whole number (for example, 2.)
.
.
At this point, the difference between the numerators is now . That allows a number ( in this case) to fit between the bounds. However, can't be written as finite decimals.
Try multiplying the numerator and the denominator by a different number.
.
.
.
.
.
.
It is important to note that some expressions for can be simplified. For example, because of the common factor .
This answer is copied and pasted from an online site (aops) and this is what their explanation was, so please do not report for plagiarism!
Step-by-step explanation:
Because $c$ can be written as a finite decimal, we know it can be written as a fraction whose numerator is an integer and whose denominator is a power of $10$. Thus, after simplification, the denominator must still be a divisor of some power of $10$. That is, it must be factorable into $2$s and $5$s.
Since this denominator is a single digit, our choices are $1,$ $2,$ $4,$ $5,$ or $8$. We have the same options for the numerator, since we know $1/c$ also has a finite decimal. From here we could just test all the possibilities to see if they're between $1.5$ and $2,$ but with a little cleverness we can eliminate some of the remaining possibilities. If we don't use $5$ as the numerator or denominator, then $c$ is forced to be a power of $2$, so it can't be between $1.5$ and $2$. So, we must use $5$, and our only plausible choices are $5/2$ (which is $2.5$), $5/4$ (which is $1.25$), and $8/5$ (which is $1.6$). Of these, only $c=\boxed{8/5}$ works.
One sample t-test for population mean would be the most appropriate method.
Step-by-step explanation:
Following is the data which botanist collected and can use:
Sample mean
Sample Standard Deviation
Sample size (Which is 10)
Distribution is normal
We have to find the best approach to construct the confidence interval for one-sample population mean. Two tests are used for constructing the confidence interval for one-sample population mean. These are:
One-sample z test for population mean
One-sample t test for population mean
One sample z test is used when the distribution is normal and the population standard deviation is known to us. One sample t test is used when the distribution is normal, population standard deviation is unknown and sample standard deviation is known.
Considering the data botanist collected, One-sample t test would be the most appropriate method as we have all the required data for this test. Using any other test will result in flawed intervals and hence flawed conclusions.
Therefore, One-sample t-test for population mean would be the most appropriate method.