The answer to this question is: Risk
In most cases, something that give the potential reward of time, money, and reputation will also possess the risk of losing that same thing at the same degree. This principle will often used by investors to choose which portofolio that they want to pursue with their capital.
Answer:
Dagwood bonds receivables 300,000 debit
Cash 300,000 credit
--to record purchase of bonds--
Interest receivables 18,000 debit
Interest revenue 18,000 credit
--to record accrued interest on dagwood bonds--
Cash 18,000 debit
Interest receivables 18,000 credit
--to record collection of interest--
Explanation:
as the bonds are purchased at par we pay for the same as the face value
interest for the year
principal x rate
300,000 x 6% = 18,000
at December 31th the interest are receivables as we didn't collect the cash yet
Then, on january first, we receive the cash and write-off the receivables
Answer:
Explanation:
Great question, intermediaries are sometimes necessary since they provide a service in which you might not be able to get the product if their service wasn't provided. That being said we can say that Caesar's claim is not valid in many cases. Intermediaries tend to add an additional cost to a certain product, but like mentioned above they are providing an essential value. In many cases the value they create more than offsets the costs they add. Therefore the validity of Caesar's claim is dependent on the intermediaries provided value.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
price = $47.82
Explanation:
Find the present value of each dividend at the required rate of return and sum them up to get the current price;
PV = FV /(1+r)^n
PV(D1) = 3.55/ (1.099^1) = 3.2302
PV(D2) = 4.65/ (1.099^2) = 3.8500
PV(D3) = 5.85 / (1.099^3) = 4.4072
PV(Price at t=4) = 53 / (1.099^4) = 36.3316
Price = 3.2302+2.9392+4.4072+36.3316
= 47.81897
Therefore, price = $47.82
