Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
The current liabilities is computed as:
Current Assets (CA) = Quick assets (QA)+ Inventory (I)
CA = QA + $49,000
Acid test ratio = Quick assets / Current Liabilities (CL)
2.8 = QA / CL
QA = 2.8 × CL
Current Ratio (CR) = CA / CL
3.5 = CA / CL
Putting CA = QA + Inventory
3.5 = ( QA + $49,000) / CL
Now, Putting QA = 2.8 × CL
So,
3.5 = [( 2.8 × CL ) + $49,000] / CL
3.5 = 2.8 CL / CL + $49,000 / CL
3.5 = 2.8 + ($49,000 / CL)
3.5 - 2.8 = $49,000 / CL
0.7 = $49,000 / CL
CL = $49,000 / 0.7
CL = $70,000
Answer:
It is cheaper to make the part in house.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Harrison Enterprises currently produces 8,000 units of part B13.
Current unit costs for part B13 are as follows:
Direct materials $12
Direct labor 9
Factory rent 7
Administrative costs 10
General factory overhead (allocated) 7
Total $45
If Harrison decides to buy part B13, 50% of the administrative costs would be avoided.
To calculate whether it is better to make the par in-house or buy, we need to determine which costs are unavoidable.
Unavoidable costs:
Factory rent= 7
Administrative costs= 5
General factory overhead= 7
Total= 17
Now, we can calculate the unitary cost of making the product in-house:
Unitary cost= direct material + direct labor + avoidable administrative costs
Unitary cost= 7 + 5 + 5= $17
It is cheaper to make the part in house.
A) Accounting profits dont take implicit costs into account, only "real" or quantifiable costs.
Thus the present value of a 120,000 lease at 5% for three years with explicit costs of $40,000 maintenance is:
PV = [ FV/(1+r)^n ] - (Explicit Cost)
PV = 120000/(1.05^3) - (40000*3)
B) same thing but add implicit costs ...
PV = 120000/(1.05^3) - (40000*3) - (55000*3)
Answer:
Sam’s Home Store can enforce the contract against Restore Construction Company
Explanation:
In contract law, only the parties involved in a contract can take action to enforce the contract. In this case Sam' Home Store signed the contract with Restore, so they can enforce it. Any third party beneficiaries from the contract, like United Building Supplies, are not entitled to enforce anything.
