Answer:
When Peter Solvik joined Cisco in January 1993 as the company's CIO, Cisco was a $500 million company running a UNIX-based software package to support its core transaction processing, including financial, manufacturing, and order entry systems. At that time, Cisco was experiencing significant growth. However, the application didn't provide the degree of redundancy, reliability, and maintainability that Cisco needed to meet the business requirements anymore. The current systems may be good for $300 million companies, but they were not suitable for a $1 billion dollar company. Solvik let each functional area make its own decision regarding the application and timing of its move, but all functional areas were required to use common architecture and databases. However, in the following years, the functional area were facing dilemma. Anything Cisco did would just run over the legacy systems. It turned into an effort to constantly band-aid the existing systems. So the systems replacement difficulties of functional areas perpetuated the deterioration of Cisco's legacy environment. System outages became routines. Finally, in January of 1994, Cisco's legacy environment failed. As a result, the company was largely shut down for two days.
Why were no managers eager to take on this project?
Because if Cisco wanted to replace the existing legacy systems, the system in each functional areas had to make change accordingly. Take manufacturing for example, if manufacturing wanted to spend $5 or $6 million dollars to buy a package and by the way it will take a year or more to get it. It was too much to justify. Therefore, none of managers was going to throw out the legacies and do something big. In a word, because implementation a new system would cost a lot of money and take long time to be realized, no one was individually going to go out and buy a package.
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
A good number of problems usually arise with outsourcing from outside the country.
1. Different laws and regulations: this is one if not the greatest impediments to outsourcing staff for a business. The legal and tax implications of outsourcing to a different country creates the need to make sure business processes align with the legal frameworks or laws in these regions.
2. Language barriers: this aspect considers the challenges of communication when utilizing BPO services. There is the need for clear communication using US English from the example. Example outsourcing to an Asian country where English is somewhat a rarity.
3. There is also the need for increased data protection, privacy and security measures as there is more exposure to data breaches with this form of outsourcing.
4. However overall outsourcing makes available cheaper labour as well as more competent hands as is this case with US and China
Answer:
A. Set above equilibrium price
Explanation:
A price ceiling is a mandatory maximum price that a seller is allowed to charge. Generally, a government may impose this in order to protect consumers, especially with regards to the purchase of essential goods.
If the price ceiling was set below the equilibrium price (option c) or if the equilibrium price is above the price ceiling (option b), it will immediately cause a shortage (option d) since the quantity demanded would be higher than the quantity supplied when the price falls. This is because people will be willing to purchase more since it is cheaper but suppliers will be willing to produce less due to lower profits. Hence, options b, c and d are eliminated.
Option A is correct because... (please refer attached diagram):
When the price ceiling is above the equilibrium price, suppliers are willing to supply more since they can make higher profits but consumers will reduce purchasing since it is expensive. However, it does not cause any immediate effect because it takes time for suppliers to be able to produce more and cannot be done immediately unless anticipated in advance. In the long run however, quantity demanded will fall from equilibrium quantity to D1 and quantity supplied will rise from equilibrium quantity to S1. Hence, causing a surplus between D1 - S1 in the long run.
Price of elasticity of demand represents the measure of the change in the quantity demanded of a product in relation to its price change. The fact that Jessica buys each month exactly teh same quantity of the roduct (Big Mac) no matter what the price of the product ismeans that Jessica's price elasticity of demand for Big Macs is: 0.
In this situation the price of the product does not affect the demand.
<span>The best advice to be given to Ms. Lee in regards to the
scenario is that she has the eligibility for a SEP in which she could enrolled
in before she could even move to the location where she would likely be
residing to. With this plan, if she notified about moving earlier or in
advance, the period will only last for about two months in addition.</span>
