Answer:
Olá, realizei algumas pesquisas e encontrei a opção que você precisava.
<em><u>d. Não definir forças, oportunidades, fraquezas e ameaças, as quais a empresa está inserida.</u></em>
Explanation:
<u>A estratégia organizacional</u> é definida de acordo com as metas e objetivos que a empresa deseja alcançar no curto e longo prazo.
Por isso é necessário implementar planos que auxiliem a empresa na obtenção dos resultados esperados.
A análise SWOT é uma ferramenta de gestão estratégica utilizada para que uma organização tenha conhecimento das variáveis internas (forças e fraquezas) e externas (oportunidades e ameaças) que influenciam no seu desempenho e consequentemente nos resultados.
Portanto <em><u>a alternativa D é falsa</u></em>, visto que a análise das forças, oportunidades, fraquezas e ameaças organizacionais, irão orientar a empresa a identificar os seus pontos positivos e negativos de forma a coordenar, corrigir e controlar seus ambientes para que se alcance maior eficácia organizacional.
Answer:
John
Explanation:
Neil will have the following amount after ten years.
Simple interest is calculated using the formula,
I= p x r x t
where I= interest, P= principal amount, r = interest rate, t is time
for Neil interest will be= $15,000 x 3/100 x 10
=$15,000 x 0.03 x 10
=$4500
Neil will have principal + interest amount
=$4,500 + $15,000
=$19,500
John invested in a compound interest account.
The amount after ten years will be
The formula for compound interest is
FV = PV × (1+r)^n
where FV = Future Value
PV = Present Value
r = annual interest rate
n = number of periods
After ten years, John will have
Fv= $15,000 x (1 + 3/100)^10
Fv= $15,000 x (1.03)^10
FV =$15,000 x 1.34391
Fv = $15,158.75
John will be able to clear his mortgage.
Answer:
hedging
Explanation:
According to my research on different business strategies, I can say that based on the information provided within the question in this example, the corn processor is hedging. This term refers to an investment position whose main focus is to offset potential losses or gains that may be incurred by a certain investment.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
2 more cars will be produced in the market equilibrium versus the social optimum. The right answer is a.
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
demand for cars is given by the function P = 75 − 3q
private costs are given by the function P = 10 + 2q
75 − 3q= 10 + 2q
Therefore, 65=5q
q=13
P=36
Therefore, socially optimal number of cars is 13.
To calculate How many more cars will be produced in the market equilibrium versus the social optimum, we have to calculate the following:
social cost=10+2q+10
=20+2q
75 − 3q=20+2q
55=5q
q=11
P=20+2(11)=42
Therefore, Qm-Qs=13-11
Qm-Qs=2
2 more cars will be produced in the market equilibrium versus the social optimum
