Answer:
It does not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to evaluate if a particular transaction carried out between a customer and an inn falls within the dictates of the local consumer protection law in the state.
Firstly, we look at what the local consumer protection law of the state talks about. It explicitly stated that customers should get receipts when suppliers receive deposits from them. Thus, this make the receipt act as the first thing to have if there would be any claim under the consumer protection law for the transaction carried out in the state.
Now, looking at the particular scenario we have, the customer paid for the room, but he was not issued a receipt. This makes the case not treatable within the consumer protection law of the state as the receipt which should have been a prerequisite for further exploration is not available
Answer:
The total cost at 9000 anchor is $473400
Explanation:
To come up with the cost equation used by the manager, we need to find the variable cost per unit.
The total cost at production level of 5300 is = 5300 * 54 = $286200
Out of the total costs, $18000 are fixed.
Thus, variable costs at production of 5300 is = 286200 - 18000 = $268200
The variable cost per unit is = 268200 / 5300 = $50.60
Let x be the number of anchors produced.
The cost equation is = 18000 + 50.60x
At 9000 anchors, the total cost will be,
Total cost = 18000 + 50.60 * (9000) = $473400
Answer:
$114,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Net credit sales = $2,250,000
Opening allowance for Doubtful Accounts = $36,000
Uncollectible accounts receivable written off = $90,000
Firstly, we need to find the excess amount to be adjusted to allowance for Doubtful Accounts. It is calculated as follows:
= Uncollectible accounts receivable written off - Opening allowance for Doubtful Accounts
= $90,000 - $36,000
= $54,000
Allowance amount:
= 10% of the balance in receivables
= 0.1 × $600,000
= $60,000
Therefore, the required adjustment to the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts at December 31, 2017 is determined by summing up the excess amount and allowance amount.
= Excess amount to be adjusted to allowance for Doubtful Accounts + Allowance amount
= $54,000 + $60,000
= $114,000
Answer:
A. elastic.
Explanation:
Elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in price.
Demand is elastic when a change in price leads to a change in quantity demanded. The coefficient of elasticity for elastic demand is usually greater than one.
Demand is inelastic when a change in price has no effect on quantity demanded.
The absolute value of the coefficient of elasticity for inelastic demand is usually less than 1.
Demand is unitary when a change in price leads to an equal proportional change in quantity demanded.
The absolute value of the coefficient of elasticity for unitary demand is usually equal to one .
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: the employees have engaged in an unfair labor practice strike.
Explanation:
To begin with, due to the fact that the union was already establishing the area for the negotiation and they might have planeed obviously to keep trying to increase the situation in their favour then the action taken by the employees was a bit hurry and was obvious that was not thought very well with calm minds and therefore that they engaged in an unfair labor practice strike because they had to be patience and wait for the union to improve the situation for them, because their are the representatives and if the company sees that the workers do not obey to the representatives then the union will lose negotiation power and the situation will get worse for them.
