Correct question: I do not know if this question is complete or not but if i understand you well enough, I'd say that the minimally acceptable rate of pay will be in accordance to what is obtainable in yur state or area. $X.XX represents pay per hour while $XX.XXX represents pay per year.
Answer:
I would say Negotiable to be on the safe side if you can't come up with a certain amount by yourself.
Explanation:
When you have to fill on an application and it gets to the rate of pay, you either be on the safer side and write Negotiable if you do not want to sell yourself short or be too pricey. But it is almost certain that the rate of pay applicable in your state or area is what you will be getting per hour.
I hope this helps.
Answer:
Amount insurer pays = $7000
Amount Ashley pays = $3000
Explanation:
Given that
Deductible = 1000
Incured medical Bill's = 10,000
On a 80-20 coinsurance clause
The insurer pays 80% of incured cost minus deductible and Ashley pays 20% of incured cost plus deductibles.
Therefore
Amount insurer pays = (10000 × 0.8) - 1000
= 8000 - 1000
= $7000
Amount Ashley Pays = (10000 × 0.2) + 1000
= 2000 + 1000
= $3000
If Ray earns $900 a week and deductions are 28% Ray's take home pay is:
$648 a week
If we assume that the deductions of 28% are taken out of the $900 weekly we will multiply 900 by 0.28 = 252. Then subtract 252 which is the deduction amount from the 900 and we end up with take home pay of $648.
<span>Setting a rent control price ceiling will cause the same impact as any other price ceiling that is below the market equilibrium price: it will create a shortage in the market. At the price equilibrium of $600, the number of renters would exactly meet the number of available 2 bedroom apartments. However, with this fixed price ceiling, the position along the demand curve will shift to one of higher demand, with no analogous change in the supply curve. Thus there will be more renters than can be supported, and renters will have to look for alternatives and substitutes.</span>
Answer:
Leverage buyout
Explanation:
Leverage buyout refers to the acquisition of another company using debt as the main source of financing the deal. The acquiring company borrows from various sources and will often use the assets of the acquired company as collateral. In leverage buyout, the acquiring entity borrows up to 80 percent or more and finances the balance with its equity.
The use of debt enhances the rate of return of the acquiring firm. Greystone Group is using 5 million of its funds and borrowing 20 million. The debts represent 80 percent of the cost of acquisition. The acquiring entity can achieve a higher rate of return by using as little of its funds as possible.
