Tell him that even though his method works, you know of a better method. Show him your approach and recommend he always use it going forward.
Explanation:
The best thing to do in this problem is to tell him that even though his method works, there is a better method.
- This better method is best presented in a subtle and practical way.
- It is best to relate the new method to the experience employee and with his experience he should be able to make logical decisions on which method to adopt.
- it is not easy to disrupt the way things are being done. it puts the whole process at risk through with productivity can suffer.
- To disrupt a process in a good way, all parties should ratify the new process and come to terms with it.
- This can be done by a little demo to show how positively the new technique can improve productivity, efficiency and other important parameters.
Learn more:
Ethics brainly.com/question/5907615
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
parent-support group
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various sociologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is an example of a parent-support group. This is a type of group within a community in which the parents of the community gather together and discuss important issues regarding the community and it's inhabitants including their children. Just like what is going on in this situation.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
A) Emphysema
Explanation:
A condition in which the air sacs of the lungs are damaged and enlarged, causing breathlessness.
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
