Answer:
Insect respiration is independent of its circulatory system; therefore, the blood does not play a direct role in oxygen transport. Insects have a highly specialized type of respiratory system called the tracheal system, which consists of a network of small tubes that carries oxygen to the entire body.
I dont know the language but heres the answer
Insect respiration is independent of its circulatory system; therefore, the blood does not play a direct role in oxygen transport. Insects have a highly specialized type of respiratory system called the tracheal system, which consists of a network of small tubes that carries oxygen to the entire body.
Answer:
3. This will lead to a biased sample because the type of students who take Psychology and Law may be different from the type of students who take Introduction to Neuroscience
Explanation:
Professor Kramer wants to measure the level of happiness of his students, and he wants to do so for both his classes. However, he will biased the survey simply because he is considering surveying only the students from one of his classes, who may be very different from the students from the other class.
If Professor Kramer wants to make a unbiased survey, he should either find a way to also apply the survey to the students from the other class, or change the goal of the research to measuring the happiness level of the Psychology and Law class students only.
It was the Rorschach inkblot test. The Rorschach Inkblot Test is a projective mental test comprising of 10 inkblots imprinted on cards made in 1921 with the distribution of Psychodiagnostik by Hermann Rorschach. Amid the 1950s, the test was synonymous with clinical brain research. All through a great part of the twentieth century, the Rorschach inkblot test was a normally utilized and deciphered the mental test.
Answer: A) no damages from the driver
Explanation:
CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE is a defence where a person is ruled to have contributed to whatever injury there may have sustained in the matter at hand, through their own negligence.
When this happens, the plaintiff is COMPLETELY BARRED from receiving any form of compensation from the Defense.
This is a particularly harsh doctrine that has been abolished in many Common Law countries who instead now follow the COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE approach where the Plaintiff's claim is reduced by the percentage they contributed to the accident. In this case their claim would be reduced by 20% leading to $80,000 being paid by the Defendant.
