B = hourly rate for babysitting and w = hourly rate for working at water park
3b + 10w = 109...multiply by -8
8b + 12w = 177...multiply by 3
----------------------
-24b - 80w = - 872 (result of multiplying by -8)
24b + 36w = 531 (result of multiplying by 3)
---------------------add
- 44w = - 341
w = -341/-44
w = 7.75 <=== hourly rate for working at water park
3b + 10w = 109
3b + 10(7.75) = 109
3b + 77.50 = 109
3b = 109 - 77.50
3b = 31.50
b = 31.50/3
b = 10.50 <== hourly rate for babysitting
Answer:
She subtracted the GCF from the second term in the expression instead of dividing.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the expression 32ab-8b, to find the common greatest factor, we will bring out a function that us common to both terms 32ab and 8b. To do that, we need to first find their individual factors as shown:
32ab = (2×2×2)×2×2×a×(b)
8b = (2×2×2×b)
From both factors, the common terms are the values in parenthesis i.e 2×2×2×b = 8b
Hence the GCF of the expression 32ab - 8b is 8b. On factoring out 8b from the expression we will have;
= 32ab - 8b
= 8b(32ab/8b - 8b/8b)
= 8b(4a-1)
Comparing the gotten equation with Venita's own, 8b(4a-0), we can say that she correctly factored out the GCF but her error was that she subtracted 8b from the second term of the expression instead of dividing by 8b. 8b-8b is what gives her 0 making her expression wrong. She should have divided her second term also by 8b to have 8b/8b which results in 1 instead of 0 that venita got.
Answer:
An eight-digit grid coordinate gives a precision to the nearest 10 meters
Step-by-step explanation:
Grid coordinates are meant to accurately direct to a specific location, using a map that comes with vertical and horizontal lines of equal spacing and numbers attached to each line to map out a location. The crossing vertical and horizontal lines have unique numbers and form small squares known as grid squares.
The more digits in the coordinate of a point the increase in precision an eight- digit gives a precision to the nearest 10 meters
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to warrant the rejection of the claim that the mean weight of cereal is atleast 14 oz
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypothesis for the test above will be stated as follows :
The claim to be tested is the alternative hypothesis, which is the negation of the Null hypothesis
H0 : μ < 14
H1 : μ ≥ 14
If the Null is rejected, then it means that the company's claim that the mean weight of its cereal being atleast 14 is valid ;
Then it means there is significant evidence to support the stance that the mean weight of cereal in the company's packet is atleast 14 oz.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) = |x - h| + k has a vertex at (h, k), where both h and k are positive. Only
"On a coordinate plane, an absolute value graph has a vertex at (2, 1)" satisfies those requirements.
