Answer:
The on-line research strategies that raises the most concerns regarding ethical principle of respecting the autonomy of research subjects and the corresponding federal regulations requiring informed consent are: C) and D).
Explanation:
C) A researcher observing an open support group whithout announcing her presence is an alteration of both respecting the autonomy of the research subjets and also doesn´t consider the regulations requiring informed consent.
The subjects should know they are being subjtect of a research, to see if they agree or not. The researcher by not annouincing her is not respecting their autonomy to decide.
D) If a researcher poses to be a survivor from cancer when not, to be able to get closer to people that are; she is violating both the respecto for autonomy on the research subjects and also she is braking the informed consent.
The answer is: nature and nurture
Nature and nurture is the ongoing debate in psychological field on whether humans development is mostly influenced by environmental or genetic factors.
Twins often used in such experiment because they have same genetic material. This means that if they were separated, the researchers could analyze whether the environment where they grow up resulted in radical difference within the children's development.
Answer: From Piaget's theory of cognitive development, The concept of Object Permanence.
Explanation:Object Permanence, for the baby means that he is starting to understand that things can disappear although they aren't gone forever.
Since Jonathan's mom left him he began to cry because he did not want her to leave although he knows she won't be gone forever.
Answer:
c. Under Original Medicare, there is a single deductible amount due for the first 60 days of any inpatient hospital stay, after which it converts into a per-day amount through day 90. After day 90, he would pay a daily amount up to 60 days over his lifetime, after which he would be responsible for all costs.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In this question, what is asked is to compare the plagiarism of the student version compared to this original version form the author.
The original version is the one that appears in this question. The version of the student is the following:
"Teachers don't often provide feedback anonymously, but the ability to provide feedback anonymously may create a context where the rationale associated with specific suggestions can be more safely explored (Howard, Barrett, & Frick, 2010). However, we cannot assume that all anonymous online spaces will serve as safe social spaces."
We have three options in this question: A) word-for-word plagiarism. B) paraphrasing plagiarism. C) this is no plagiarism. So, by the way, the student's answer was written, we can assume that there is no plagiarism.
