Answer:
i think it's congruent .
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hypotheses:

(Left tailed test)
p = sample proportion
n = sample size = 200
Sample proportion = p = 73/200 = 0.365
Std error = 0.03404
p difference = 0.365-0.39 = 0.025
t = 0.025/se = 0.7344
df = 199
p value = 0.2317
Since p >0.05 accept null hypothesis
No,the veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical because there is no statistical evidence to support his claim.
Answer:
d. can be equal to the value of the coefficient of determination (r2).
True on the special case when r =1 we have that 
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to remember that the correlation coefficient is a measure to analyze the goodness of fit for a model and is given by:
The determination coefficient is given by 
Let's analyze one by one the possible options:
a. can never be equal to the value of the coefficient of determination (r2).
False if r = 1 then 
b. is always larger than the value of the coefficient of determination (r2).
False not always if r= 1 we have that
and we don't satisfy the condition
c. is always smaller than the value of the coefficient of determination (r2).
False again if r =1 then we have
and we don't satisfy the condition
d. can be equal to the value of the coefficient of determination (r2).
True on the special case when r =1 we have that 
The New pay in current year is = $ 2225
The old pay in the last year was = $ 2176
percentage (%) increase formula = (new value- old value ) *100 / old value
which becomes,,

which equals to 2.3% .
Hence, the average net pay per month increased is 2.3% .