All categories

2 years ago

Which term describes the seller's ability and desire to sell goods and services? A. supply B. demand C. equilibrium

Mathematics

1 answer:

Leya [2.2K]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

A. supply

Step-by-step explanation:

The term that best describes the seller's ability and desire to sell goods and services out of given options is supply.

Buyer's willingness to buy a certain good at a certain price is defined as demand by most economists.

where as the seller's willingness to provide a certain good or service at a certain price is defined as supply by most economists. Supply does not merely means amount of goods supplied rather, for economists supply is a relationship between set of assigned prices and the amount of goods assigned to be sold at those prices.

hence the term that best describes the seller's ability and desire to sell goods and services out of given options is supply !

You might be interested in

Aramis is adjusting a satellite because he finds it is not focusing the incoming radio waves perfectly. The shape of his satelli

Alika [10]

Given the equation of the parabola

$(x-4)^2=3(y-3).$

The vertex of this parabola is placed at point (4,3).

If the equation of the parabola is $(x-x_0)^2=2p(y-y_0),$ then

$2p=3,\\ \\p=1.5.$

The coordinates of the parabola focus are

$\left(x_0,y_0+\dfrac{p}{2}\right).$

Therefore, the focus is placed at point (4,3,75).

Answer: option D, 0.75 in. above the vertex

3 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Fiona and her friends went to a smoothie shop. They ordered three strawberry smoothies and two protein shakes for a total of $24

yulyashka [42]

5.25 dollars for the protein shake and 4.5 for the strawberry smoothies

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Two professors are applying for grants. Professor Jane has a probability of 0.61 of being funded. Professor Joe has probability

Anna11 [10]

Answer:

a. 0.1647;
b. 0.7153;
c. 0.4453.

Step-by-step explanation:

By definition, if two event $A$ and $B$ are independent, then

$P(A\cap B) = P(A) \cdot P(B)$ . ( $P(A\cap B)$ is the probability that the outcome of both event $A$ and event $B$ are true.)

Since the outcome of these two events are independent,

$\begin{aligned}P(\texttt{Jane} \cap \texttt{Joe}) &= P(\texttt{Jane}) \cdot P(\texttt{Joe})\\ &= 0.61 \times 0.27 \\&= 0.1647\end{aligned}$ .

The logic not operator $\lnot$ or the prime superscript $^{\prime}$ denotes that an event does not happen.

$P(\texttt{Jane}^{\prime}) = 1 - P(\texttt{Jane}) = 1- 0.61 = 0.39$ .

$P(\texttt{Joe}^{\prime}) = 1 - P(\texttt{Joe}) = 1- 0.27 = 0.73$ .

Since the two events $\texttt{Jane}$ and $\texttt{Joe}$ , $\texttt{Jane}^{\prime}$ and $\texttt{Joe}^{\prime}$ are also independent. Probability that neither professor got funded:

$P(\texttt{Jane}^{\prime} \cap \texttt{Joe}^{\prime}) = P(\texttt{Jane}^{\prime}) \cdot P(\texttt{Joe}^{\prime}) = 0.39 \times 0.73 = 0.2847$ .

Probability that at least one professor got funded- in other words, it is not true that neither professor got funded:

$P((\texttt{Jane}^{\prime} \cap \texttt{Joe}^{\prime})^{\prime}) = 1- P(\texttt{Jane}^{\prime} \cap \texttt{Joe}^{\prime}) = 0.7153$ .

Similarly, since the two events $\texttt{Jane}$ and $\texttt{Joe}$ , $\texttt{Jane}$ and $\texttt{Joe}^{\prime}$ are also independent. Probability that Jane but not Joe got funded:

$P(\texttt{Jane} \cap (\texttt{Joe}^{\prime})) = P(\texttt{Jane}) \cdot P(\texttt{Joe}^{\prime}) = 0.61 \times 0.73 = 0.4453$ .