Answer:
Mia's method have one advantage that the steps became less than Jenna's method.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jenna’s method :




Mia’s method :



To find : Explain why both Jenna and Mia arrived at the same answer and the advantage of one method over the other ?
Solution :
The method of both were different but correct.
One apply distributive property and other apply direct calculation.
So, both Jenna and Mia arrived at the same answer
But Mia's method have one advantage that the steps became less than Jenna's method.
The cost of the watch originally cost $1,640.31
The interest due on the first payment is
.. I = Prt
.. I = 110,000*.055*(1/12)
.. I = 504.17
Then the decrease in principal resulting from the first payment is
.. 568.00 -504.17 = 63.83
and the new balance is
.. $110,000.00 -63.83 = $109,936.17
Actual question is "<span>Jeremy had 3/4 of a submarine sandwich and gave his friend 1/3 of it. What fraction of the sandwich did the friend receive?"
Solution:
1/3 of 3/4 of a submarine sandwich = 1/3x3/4 = 3/12 = 1/4
so jermy gave 1/4 of the submarine sandwich to his friend. </span>
<span>the graph that represents the compound inequality –3
< n < 1 is the straight line from -3 to 1 in which there is a hollow
circle in the -3 point and in the 1 point. This is because < means that the
possible values of n is only greater than -3 exluding -3 and less than -1
excluding -1</span>