Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
the pythagorean theorem
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1) True. This is because the divergence of F is 1, thus, F is a linear function. Orientation is given outward to the surface. Linear function double integrated over a surface with outward orientation gives volume enclosed by the surface.
2) True. This is primarily what the Divergence theorem is.
3) False. If F was 3/pi instead of div(F), then the statement would have been true.
4) False. The gradient of divergence can be anything. The curl of divergence of a vector function is 0, not the gradient o divergence.
5) False. While finding Divergence, derivatives are taken for different variables. Since the derivatives of constants are 0, therefore, both the vector functions F and G can be different constant parts of there components even if their divergences are equal.
1.
In line with the test each person who came into interaction
with the infected person will become infected also. With this information, the
calculation would be: 9 people each day for 7days would be equivalent to 9 x 7
which equals 63 people.
2.
Here were 7 other people in the experiment if patient
zero is left out. If each person intermingled with 6 different people every day
in 7 days then the calculation would be: 7 people infected x 6 new people = 42
infected people each day
42 new people every day x 7 days = 294
infected persons.
To start this, you would multiply 5/8 by 100 because you’re looking for a percentage.
5/8 x 100 = 62.5%
Answer:
There is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 300
p = 5% = 0.05
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of dead pixels , x = 24
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from excel.
P-value = 0.00856
Since the p-value is smaller than the significance level, we fail to accept the null hypothesis and reject it. We accept the alternate hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
