<span>The latitude of a place affects climate because an area’s location determines how much sun it receives.
I hope this helps, good luck! :)</span>
Answer:
Stronger
Explanation:
The statistical syllogism is also called a non-deductive syllogism. This process argues in using the inductive reasoning for generalization. It is true for a particular case.
This procedure used the syllogism like most, frequently and never and rarely. It has its statistical generalizations it has one or two premises.
Premises is a generalization and argument that is used to conclude the generalization. Premises can be true and the conclusion can be wrong but it happened rarely.
Thus Zia has used here statistical syllogism for different subjects.
The correct answer is; criminal liability.
Further Explanation:
A server can face jail time and being fined for serving alcohol to an underage guest. The most likely charge they will face is a criminal liability charge. Since the servers are trained about serving alcohol and checking identification they are liable for doing their job.
Serving any alcohol product to someone underage is illegal in the United States. The age that a person can legally buy alcohol is 21 years of age. If the server has given an underage person alcohol and that person drives and is in an accident the server is going to be charged also, because they are the ones responsible for serving the underage person. In addition to being charged with a crime, the person can be sued, banned from working in an establishment that has alcohol, and fired from their job.
Learn more about underage drinking at brainly.com/question/11824838
#LearnwithBrainly
Tell him that even though his method works, you know of a better method. Show him your approach and recommend he always use it going forward.
Explanation:
The best thing to do in this problem is to tell him that even though his method works, there is a better method.
- This better method is best presented in a subtle and practical way.
- It is best to relate the new method to the experience employee and with his experience he should be able to make logical decisions on which method to adopt.
- it is not easy to disrupt the way things are being done. it puts the whole process at risk through with productivity can suffer.
- To disrupt a process in a good way, all parties should ratify the new process and come to terms with it.
- This can be done by a little demo to show how positively the new technique can improve productivity, efficiency and other important parameters.
Learn more:
Ethics brainly.com/question/5907615
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
They might have been written down and codified because they wanted to keep it more of a secret but idk i hope this helps
Explanation:
