Answer:
$5,960
Explanation:
Fixed portion of Miscellaneous expenses = $2,000
Variable portion of Miscellaneous expenses = ($5,300 - $2,000) / $275,000
= $3,300 / $275,000
= $0.012 of sales
Miscellaneous expenses in the Year 2 selling expense budget = (Budgeted sales * Variable portion) + Fixed portion
= ($330,000 * $0.012) + $2,000
= $3,960 + $2,000
= $5,960
c. Sailors would be the correct answer
Answer:
Pike owes $1200 in taxes is she the purchase $16,000 in Oregon and owes $820 in transactions if she purchase $16,000 in Oergon.
Explanation:
Re call that the total tax is the rate tax time the purchase amount.
T= R * P
Then the use tax that Pike owe to California for the purchase of $16,000 in Oregon Tc taking a rate of 7.5 percent is:
Tc = 0.075 * $16,000 = $ 1,200
The use tax that Pike owe to California for the purchase of $16,000 in New Mexicon Tn dont take into account the sales but the transaction rate of 5.125 percent:
Tn = 0.05125 * $16,000 = $820
Answer:
Ignacio would have to fire some of his full time workers and hire contingent workers.
Contingent workers are independent contractors. So Ignacio wouldn't be responsible for paying employment taxes since contingent workers are responsible for handling their own taxes.
Answer:
a. $140,000 decrease
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}Year&continued&discontinued&differential\\Sales&680,000&0&-680,000\\variable \: cost&-540,000&0&540,000\\contibution&140,000&0&-140,000\\fixed \: cost&-145,000&-145,000&0\\net \: income&-5,000&-145,000&-140,000\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7DYear%26continued%26discontinued%26differential%5C%5CSales%26680%2C000%260%26-680%2C000%5C%5Cvariable%20%5C%3A%20cost%26-540%2C000%260%26540%2C000%5C%5Ccontibution%26140%2C000%260%26-140%2C000%5C%5Cfixed%20%5C%3A%20cost%26-145%2C000%26-145%2C000%260%5C%5Cnet%20%5C%3A%20income%26-5%2C000%26-145%2C000%26-140%2C000%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
The fixed cost would not be eliminated entirely and we have no information of any partial decrease. so the differential analysis shows a decrease in 140,000 in the net income if product T is discountinued
