The correct answer would be option C, Matrix.
In a university setting, it is common for a professor to report to an academic supervisor in his/her area of educational expertise and to a supervisor overseeing a particular degree such as baccalaureate or masters. This illustrates the Matrix Structure.
Explanation:
A matrix is a structure in which something develops. This something could be culture, social, political, educational, official environment.
So a system in which a professor reports to a supervisor regarding his or her expertise area, and that supervisor further reports to the person who is seeing the particular degree overall, then this system is fostering positive aspects in educational system. This creates a matrix structure within the colleges and universities.
Learn more about Matrix structure at:
brainly.com/question/7437866
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Pilar is stating the obvious when she makes the remark since we presume two things: In first place, if she were not commenting on his/her work she would have made that remark at the beginning, which makes this statement redundant. In second place, if she were giving suggestions about how to improve the person's work, she might be trying to be polite to the client.
Pilar should have avoided saying the phrase because she either being redundant, the first scenario, or saying something inaccurate in order to b polite, as in the second scenario. As a general rule, stating something implicitly negative and even vague at the end of a comment usually confuses the recipient of the message, who has to imagine the possible meaning of that statement.
The Type II error would be to conclude that EnerG is no more nutritious than Supreme when Energy actually provides more health benefits.
Option b
<u>Explanation:</u>
Type II error sometimes referred to as beta error is a term in statistics that doesn’t reject the false-null hypothesis. It occurs when one refuses to reject the false null hypothesis. In this type of error, the false findings are accepted as true.
It also confirms two different scenarios as similar even though they are different. It can be reduced by adjusting the criteria of the null hypothesis by increasing tolerance with caution to ensure that the error type doesn’t end up being Type I error.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes it is possible for him to get some tax relief, because he has been farming for almost 30 years and has practiced the right method in doing this business, Government want people that follow the law and he has been doing it for 30years, he deserves some credit.
The tax relief also depends on the law, there will always be a criteria to be met before you can a tax relief, if he has met those criteria, he would be given but from what he has do e in the farming business, and his adherence to the right method, can earn him a tax relief.
