Correct answer choices are :
<h2> B) Stability of Government
</h2><h2> C) Victory in war
</h2><h2> D) High gross domestic product
</h2><h2> F) Low employment rate</h2><h2 /><h2>Explanation:</h2><h2 />
A store currency is a currency that is held in important measures by governments and organizations as part of their foreign exchange resources. The store currency is generally used in international affairs, international finances and all features of the global economy.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
<span>The misinformation effect. This effect is often most problematic in criminal proceedings from witnesses and victims. To avoid this testimonies are often taken very shortly after the incident.</span>
        
             
        
        
        
The following that would most likely achieve your goal would be to <u>Send all the donations to the shelter that has the least.</u>
As the coordinator of a nonprofit that <em>distributes donated items</em> to three local homeless shelters, if i were to figure out a way to send donated items to three shelters that need them the most, <u>finding out the shelter that has the least</u> supplies and sending the donations to them would be the most plausible
The most likely answer would be the second option because the goal is to <em>distribute the donated items to the shelters who need it the most.</em>
<em />
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/15773457
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Alexander Hamilton, the Secretary of Treasury, wanted to focus on manufacture and trade.  However, Thomas Jefferson aimed at developing trade and agriculture.
Explanation:
Hamilton and Jefferson had largely opposing viewpoints on the political spectrum in American politics in the 1780s and 1790s. Hamilton was a Federalist and he supported a strong central government and the industrial strength of the Northeastern states. He also advocated a strong central bank. Jefferson believed a strong central bank was unconstitutional and he was more in favor of state power than federal power. He represented the Southern states and the slave-owning landowners.