Saint Thomas would most likely said that the only reason he conducted the 'homophobic actions' was because it violate the rules of God.
In that time, this kind of defense was perfectly plausible since the Church at that time had a huge influence in the Government. But our time, this type of reason wouldn't be plausible.
The damage may have resulted in <span>brain lesion
</span><span>brain lesion refers to the abnormal formation of your brain's blood vessels.
</span>The only way for us to spot a brain lesion is by using imaging technology such as MRI. If left untreated, brain lesion could lead to change in personality, loss in memory, or even brain aneurysm.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In this question, what is asked is to compare the plagiarism of the student version compared to this original version form the author.
The original version is the one that appears in this question. The version of the student is the following:
"Teachers don't often provide feedback anonymously, but the ability to provide feedback anonymously may create a context where the rationale associated with specific suggestions can be more safely explored (Howard, Barrett, & Frick, 2010). However, we cannot assume that all anonymous online spaces will serve as safe social spaces."
We have three options in this question: A) word-for-word plagiarism. B) paraphrasing plagiarism. C) this is no plagiarism. So, by the way, the student's answer was written, we can assume that there is no plagiarism.
Answer:
D. people's acceptance of ruler's authority
Explanation:
In a democracy, the legitimacy of a ruler depends directly on the acceptance of the people who elected him or her. The ruler has the autonomy and authority to make decisions that represent the people, but he or she is only a representative, the legal power emanating from the people.
