Hello. This question is incomplete. Full question is:
Read the fictitious killer Robot case found at the web site for the Online Ethics Center for Engineering & Science.
The case begins with the incitement of a programmer for manslaughter for writing a faulty code that resulted in the death of a robot operator. Slowly, over the course of many articles, you are introduced to several factors within the corporation that contributed to the accident. Read the case and answer the following questions:
Responsibility for an accident is rarely defined clearly and is often difficult to trace to one or two people or causes. In this fictitious case, it is clear that a large number of people share responsibility for the accident. Identify all the people you think were at least partially responsible for the death of Bart Matthews, and explain why you think so.
Answer and Explanation:
When reading the case indicated in the question above, we can see that it is a case where a poorly programmed industrial robot killed its operator. In this case, we can point out that the programmers of this robot are the first culprits. This is because the robot in question exhibited a violent and dangerous behavior that could have been avoided with correct programming and effective tests. This shows that the programmers did not have enough knowledge and experience to work on this project. This makes us able to point out other culprits that is the company that hired the programmers called Silicon Techtronics, as well as the manager and responsible for the project because it had the obligation to assess the degree of professionalism of the programmers, as well as ensuring the safety of employees.
Answer:
The best answer choice from the list given, for the question: When deciding on specific kinds of evidence to use in a persuasive argument, the following kinds of evidence should be considered: Select one... would be, C: Factual, sensible and useful.
Explanation:
Persuasive writing is another way of speaking about argumentative essay writing. The point of this type of writing is to persuade a reader to accept the specific viewpoint on a matter on the part of the writer, and convince him by providing evidence that shows that the claim is truer than the counterclaims that may be against it. The evidence that is selected by the author will be vital to support the thesis, and persuade the reader, and it must be logical, factual, solid and filled with data, examples and even quotations from experts in order to prove a point. All data gathered must also be sensible and useful as its purpose is not just to inform a person, but to persuade them to take the side of the claim and not the counterclaims.
Answer: c) Hold on to her identity
Explanation:
Holding onto identity displays the characteristic of representing what an individual actually is. Qualities, beliefs, thoughts, emotion etc remain same as that person holds in their personality no matter where the person is or whatever age he/she turns into.
According to the question,Brenda is showing that she still holds her identity because she chose picture of her mother and her as valuable item .
Other options are incorrect because value of antique is not shown by her choice rather her relation with her mother is valuable to Brenda. Being young and featuring same as her mother is also not displayed through question's scenario..
Thus, the correct option is option(c).
Jacob should be a screenwright. That's because playwrights usually don't brainstorm and don't have teams who help them write or anything similar, they do it on their own. Producer's job is getting money for the project, not writing anything so it's not a producer either.
Andrew should be a playwright. Playwrights have absolute authority over their work and since it's thorough and has references and points as to how everything should look, there's nothing that should be changed in production. He attends rehearsals to see how it all sounds and looks.
<span>These would be two of the main branches (or disciplines) of geography. The physical branch deals with the actual landforms and seeks to see the study as an actual Earth science. Human geography, in comparison, is a way of looking at the world that tries to understand how cultures and peoples are shaped. This takes into account religion, economics, health, culture, time, politics, and other aspects.</span>
