answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ganezh [65]
2 years ago
11

Zack has two savings accounts with a total of $9,000. he withdrew 10% from one and 60% from the other to buy his girlfriend an e

ngagement ring. if the ring cost $2,175, find the remaining balance in each account.
Business
1 answer:
skelet666 [1.2K]2 years ago
8 0
Originally,
Let x = the balance in the first account.
Let y = the balance in the second account.

The total amount in the two accounts is $9,000, therefore
x + y = 9000                      (1)

Zack withdraws 10% of x and 60% of y for a total of $2,175.
Therefore
0.1x + 0.6y = 2175
or
x + 6y = 21750                   (2)

Subtract (1) from (2).
x + 6y - (x + y) = 21750 - 9000
5y = 12750
y = 2550
From (1), obtain
x = 9000 - 2550 = 6450

The balance in the first account is
0.9*x = 0.9*6450 = $5,805
The remaining balance in the second account is
0.4*y = 0.4*2550 = $1,020

Answer:
The balance in the first account is $5,805
The balance in the second account is $1,020

You might be interested in
An insured owns a $50,000 whole life policy. At age 47, the insured decides to cancel his policy and exercise the extended term
Arlecino [84]

Answer:

The face amount of the new term policy would be $50,000

Explanation:

In life insurance, face amount is referred to as the amount paid on the policy's maturity date, on the death of the insured, or if the policy terms permit on his or her total disability.

The face amount of the term policy would remain the same as when it was purchased as provided under the whole life policy. which is $50,000.

8 0
2 years ago
Absorption and Variable Costing Comparisons: Production Equals Sales Assume that Smuckers manufactures and sells 30,000 cases of
pantera1 [17]

Answer:

a:<u>Total Variable Costs        $26 </u>    

a:<u>Total Manufacturing Costs = $ 30</u>  

b:<u>Net Income </u><u><em>Variable Costing</em></u><u>  $100,000</u>  

b: <u>Net Income  </u><u><em>Absorption Costing</em></u><u>  $ 100,000</u>

Explanation:

Smuckers Manufacturers

<u>Costs per case under  Variable Costing</u>

Direct materials per case 16

Direct labor per case 7

Variable manufacturing overhead per case 3

<u>Total Variable Costs        $26 </u>        

<u>Costs per case under  Absorption Costing</u>

Direct materials (30,000*16)              480,000

Direct labor (30,000*7)                    210,000

Variable manufacturing overhead  (30,000*3)   90,000

Total Variable Costs                                                       780,000

Total fixed manufacturing overhead                           $120,000

Total Manufacturing Costs                                         $ 900,000

<u>Total Manufacturing Costs per Case= $ 900,000/ 30,000= $ 30</u>

The difference between the variable and absorption costing is that the product costs include variable and fixed costs in absorption costing. But in variable costing the product costs include only variable costs.

<u><em> SMUCKERS </em></u>

<u><em>Variable Costing Income Statement </em></u>

<u><em>For the Third Quarter of 2017 </em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

Sales (30,000*34)                                                       1020,000  

Direct materials (30,000*16)              480,000

Direct labor (30,000*7)                    210,000

Variable manufacturing overhead  (30,000*3)   90,000

Total Variable Costs                                                       780,000

Contribution Margin                                                        240,000

Fixed Expenses                                                               140,000

Total fixed manufacturing overhead      $120,000

Fixed selling and administrative 20,000

<u>Net Income                                                                   100,000</u>

In this case the net income under both variable and absorption costing does not change because the units produced are units sold. No cost is charged to ending inventory under absorption costing.

<u><em>SMUCKERS </em></u>

<u><em>Absorption Costing Income Statement </em></u>

<u><em>For the Third Quarter of 2017 </em></u>

Sales (30,000*34)                                                       1020,000  

Direct materials (30,000*16)              480,000

Direct labor (30,000*7)                    210,000

Variable manufacturing overhead  (30,000*3)   90,000

Total fixed manufacturing overhead      $120,000

Total Manufacturing Costs                                              900,000

Gross Profit                                                                   120,000

Fixed Expenses                                                               20,000

Fixed selling and administrative 20,000

<u>Net Income                                                                   100,000</u>

3 0
2 years ago
A firm based in Norway has found that its growth is restricted by the limited liquidity of the Norwegian capital market. List th
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

The Mexican firm can bring capital up in the worldwide value Market, worldwide security showcase, or the Eurocurrency advertise.  

<u>The worldwide value Market </u>

The firm can offer corporate stock to outsiders on the worldwide value showcase. Numerous speculators don't accepting stock outside their national or closest stock trade. The Mexican firm can show itself on the New York, London, Hong Kong, and so on stock trade to get more speculators at a lower cost of capital. The drawback is that organizations need to set up their budget summaries in a way worthy to the outside stock trades.  

<u>The worldwide security showcase  </u>

The firm can offer a guarantee to pay in two habits, an outside bond and a Eurobond. Outside bonds are paid in the cash of the country where they are given, Eurobonds are paid in a money other than the cash where they are given. On the off chance that the firm sells an outside bond in the US, it will take care of head and enthusiasm for dollars. On the off chance that it does as such in Britain, the bond will be taken care of in pounds. With a Eurobond, the firm can sell the bond in Britain yet take care of it in dollars, yen, and so forth. Advantages incorporate less guideline, not following the local cash guarantor's money related revealing prerequisites, and not paying the local money backer's annual expenses. For instance, if the organization obtained in dollars from Britain, the organization would not need to reply to the SCC, record as indicated by US GAAP bookkeeping gauges, or make good on US annual charges  

<u>The Eurocurrency showcase  </u>

In the Eurocurrency showcase, the Mexican firm can apply for a line of credit in dollars from Britain, an advance in yen from the United States, or an advance in Euro in Japan. Less guideline brings about a lower financing cost on Eurocurrency credits. Lamentably, less guideline additionally implies a somewhat improved probability of bank disappointment.  

One drawback to these is outside trade risk. In the event that the Mexican peso devalues, the peso has less worth comparative with another unit of cash. More pesos should then be utilized to pay dollar or euro named premium installments, rule installments, profits, and so forth. In a specific way these techniques for raising outside capital have remote trade risk. Since profits don't need to be paid while advances, premium installments, and standard installments do; it may be increasingly alluring to utilize the worldwide value advertise. The main path for the Mexican firm to totally stay away from exchange risk is to utilize the Mexican capital markets.

6 0
2 years ago
Suppose the current market price of corn is $3.75 per bushel. Your firm has a technology that can convert 1 bushel of corn to 3
ipn [44]

Answer:

$1.78 per gallon of ethanol

Explanation:

The market price in which the conversion of ethanol becomes attractive is:

($3.75 + $1.60 / bushel of corn) / (3 gallons of ethanol / bushel of corn)

= $1.78 per gallon of ethanol.

7 0
2 years ago
The standards for direct labor for a product are 2.5 hours at $8 per hour. Last month, 9,000 units of the product were made and
GrogVix [38]

Answer:

21,500

Explanation:

Given that,

Labor efficiency variance = $8,000 F

Standard Rate = $8 per hour

Standards for direct labor for a product = 2.5 hours

Labor efficiency variance = (Standard Hour for actual output - Actual Hour) × Standard Rate

$8,000 = [(9,000 × 2.5) - Actual Hour] × $8 per hour

1,000 = 22,500 - Actual Hour

Actual hour = 22,500 - 1,000

                   = 21,500

Therefore, the actual number of hours worked during the past period was 21,500.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In our first Class Discussion, explain why Dr. King believed his disobedience of the so-called "Jim Crow" law in Alabama was "co
    8·1 answer
  • An industry dominated by a few large firms, all of which struggle with product differentiation, is known as A. multi-domestic. B
    5·1 answer
  • Mel’s Meals 2 Go purchases cookies that it includes in the 10,000 box lunches it prepares and sells annually. Mel’s kitchen and
    12·2 answers
  • You are considering investing in a zero-coupon bond that sells for $250. At maturity in 16 years it will be redeemed for $1,000.
    13·1 answer
  • Bypassing regular sales channels in favor of Internet retailing can have strong appeal if it A. D) includes partnering rather th
    6·1 answer
  • Your most senior employee is not willing to change how she does her job because she is satisfied with the current approach she u
    15·1 answer
  • The flaw that Joe, the CEO of Theo Chocolate, discovered in his company's early strategy was that it: a.aimed to manufacture onl
    14·1 answer
  • Swanson Company has identified the following activities related to indirect production costs: Activity Activity Costs Cost Drive
    14·1 answer
  • During 2019, Ocean Consulting had the following transactions with it clients (customers): On February 1, 2019, the company recei
    13·1 answer
  • Which one of the following statements regarding the economic order quantity (EOQ) is true? a. If an order quantity is larger tha
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!